- 01.
Many Giglio demands stop at cooperator inducements — the demand here also names agent disciplinary records, prior-inconsistent statements, and § 5K1.1 promises.
- 02.
Reply-brief framework anchors against the AUSA's typical 'we have no Giglio' boilerplate response — Kyles compels active canvass.
- 03.
Response-deadline section overlays FRCP 16's 14-day baseline against jurisdiction-specific local-rule timelines.
Order intake.
Frequently asked questions.
What does the demand contain?
Eight sections: cover (your case identifier + jurisdiction stamped on), scope of demand, the lead authority's verbatim holding with source URL, attaching-precedent citations, the pre-drafted demand language (~250 words editable), reply-brief framework anticipating government opposition, response deadlines + local-rule overlay, and the methods + source URLs bibliography.
Is this legal advice?
No. The template is a pre-trial litigation aid modeled on the published constitutional + statutory authority for federal-criminal discovery. Counsel of record adapts the demand language to the controlling circuit's doctrine and the facts of the case before serving.
How fast is delivery?
Stripe checkout completes in seconds; the PDF is emailed to the address you provide. Templates are pre-built — there is no per-case data pipeline running.
Do you cite anything I cannot independently verify?
No. Every citation in every demand carries a source URL stored alongside. Lead authorities are Brady 373 U.S. 83, Giglio 405 U.S. 150, Fed. R. Crim. P. 16, and Henthorn 931 F.2d 29. All public-domain, linked to Cornell LII or law.resource.org.
Refund policy?
7-day full refund, no questions asked.