Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, in full and source-linked.
The procedural rules that actually run a Florida criminal case — speedy trial, discovery, pretrial motions, release and detention, pleas, and postconviction relief — reproduced verbatim from the official Florida Bar publication, with every other rule indexed to its official source. A companion to the Florida criminal-statutes charge reference.
Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure · quick reference
The rules that run a Florida criminal case, in full.
The procedural rules a Florida criminal-defense practice turns to most — speedy trial, discovery, pretrial motions, pretrial release and detention, pleas, and postconviction relief — reproduced in full from the official Florida Bar publication. Each rule below is the verbatim text; the remaining rules are indexed with a link to the official source.
Each rule links to the official Florida Bar publication of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. Always open the official source for the full, current, controlling text — this reference is a navigation aid, not legal advice.
RULE 3.111. PROVIDING COUNSEL TO INDIGENTS
(a) When Counsel Provided. A person entitled to
appointment of counsel as provided herein shall have counsel
appointed when the person is formally charged with an offense, or
as soon as feasible after custodial restraint, or at the first
appearance before a committing judge, whichever occurs earliest.
(b) Cases Applicable.
(1) Counsel shall be provided to indigent persons in all
prosecutions for offenses punishable by incarceration including
appeals from the conviction thereof. In the discretion of the court,
counsel does not have to be provided to an indigent person in a
prosecution for a misdemeanor or violation of a municipal
ordinance if the judge, at least 15 days prior to trial, files in the
cause a written order of no incarceration certifying that the
defendant will not be incarcerated in the case pending trial or
probation violation hearing, or as part of a sentence after trial,
guilty or nolo contendere plea, or probation revocation. This 15-day
requirement may be waived by the defendant or defense counsel.
(A) If the court issues an order of no incarceration
after counsel has been appointed to represent the defendant, the
court may discharge appointed counsel unless the defendant is
incarcerated or the defendant would be substantially disadvantaged
by the discharge of appointed counsel.
(B) If the court determines that the defendant
would be substantially disadvantaged by the discharge of appointed
counsel, the court shall either:
(i) not discharge appointed counsel; or
(ii) discharge appointed counsel and allow
the defendant a reasonable time to obtain private counsel, or if the
defendant elects to represent himself or herself, a reasonable time
to prepare for trial.
(C) If the court withdraws its order of no
incarceration, it shall immediately appoint counsel if the defendant
is otherwise eligible for the services of the public defender. The
court may not withdraw its order of no incarceration once the
defendant has been found guilty or pled nolo contendere.
(2) Counsel may be provided to indigent persons in all
proceedings arising from the initiation of a criminal action against a
defendant, including postconviction proceedings and appeals
therefrom, extradition proceedings, mental competency
proceedings, and other proceedings that are adversary in nature,
regardless of the designation of the court in which they occur or the
classification of the proceedings as civil or criminal.
(3) Counsel may be provided to a partially indigent
person on request, provided that the person shall defray that
portion of the cost of representation and the reasonable costs of
investigation as he or she is able without substantial hardship to
the person or the person’s family, as directed by the court.
(4) “Indigent” shall mean a person who is unable to pay
for the services of an attorney, including costs of investigation,
without substantial hardship to the person or the person’s family;
“partially indigent” shall mean a person unable to pay more than a
portion of the fee charged by an attorney, including costs of
investigation, without substantial hardship to the person or the
person’s family.
(5) Before appointing a public defender, the court shall:
(A) inform the accused that, if the public defender
or other counsel is appointed, a lien for the services rendered by
counsel may be imposed as provided by law;
(B) make inquiry into the financial status of the
accused in a manner not inconsistent with the guidelines
established by section 27.52, Florida Statutes. The accused shall
respond to the inquiry under oath;
(C) require the accused to execute an affidavit of
insolvency as required by section 27.52, Florida Statutes.
(c) Duty of Booking Officer. In addition to any other duty,
the officer who commits a defendant to custody has the following
duties:
(1) The officer shall immediately advise the defendant:
(A) of the right to counsel;
(B) that, if the defendant is unable to pay a
lawyer, one will be provided immediately at no charge.
(2) If the defendant requests counsel or advises the
officer that he or she cannot afford counsel, the officer shall
immediately and effectively place the defendant in communication
with the (office of) public defender of the circuit in which the arrest
was made.
(3) If the defendant indicates that he or she has an
attorney or is able to retain an attorney, the officer shall
immediately and effectively place the defendant in communication
with the attorney or the Lawyer Referral Service of the local bar
association.
(4) The public defender of each judicial circuit may
interview a defendant when contacted by, or on behalf of, a
defendant who is, or claims to be, indigent as defined by law.
(A) If the defendant is in custody and reasonably
appears to be indigent, the public defender shall tender such advice
as is indicated by the facts of the case, seek the setting of a
reasonable bail, and otherwise represent the defendant pending a
formal judicial determination of indigency.
(B) If the defendant is at liberty on bail or
otherwise not in custody, the public defender shall elicit from the
defendant only the information that may be reasonably relevant to
the question of indigency and shall immediately seek a formal
judicial determination of indigency. If the court finds the defendant
indigent, it shall immediately appoint counsel to represent the
defendant.
(d) Waiver of Counsel.
(1) The failure of a defendant to request appointment of
counsel or the announced intention of a defendant to plead guilty
shall not, in itself, constitute a waiver of counsel at any stage of the
proceedings.
(2) A defendant shall not be considered to have waived
the assistance of counsel until the entire process of offering counsel
has been completed and a thorough inquiry has been made into
both the accused’s comprehension of that offer and the accused’s
capacity to make a knowing and intelligent waiver. Before
determining whether the waiver is knowing and intelligent, the
court shall advise the defendant of the disadvantages and dangers
of self-representation.
(3) Regardless of the defendant’s legal skills or the
complexity of the case, the court shall not deny a defendant’s
unequivocal request to represent himself or herself, if the court
makes a determination of record that the defendant has made a
knowing and intelligent waiver of the right to counsel, and does not
suffer from severe mental illness to the point where the defendant is
not competent to conduct trial proceedings by himself or herself.
(4) A waiver of counsel made in court shall be of record;
a waiver made out of court shall be in writing with not less than 2
attesting witnesses. The witnesses shall attest the voluntary
execution thereof.
(5) If a waiver is accepted at any stage of the
proceedings, the offer of assistance of counsel shall be renewed by
the court at each subsequent stage of the proceedings at which the
defendant appears without counsel.
(e) Withdrawal of Defense Counsel After Judgment and
Sentence. The attorney of record for a defendant in a criminal
proceeding shall not be relieved of any duties, nor be permitted to
withdraw as counsel of record, except with approval of the lower
tribunal on good cause shown on written motion, until after:
(1) the filing of:
(A) a notice of appeal;
(B) a statement of judicial acts to be reviewed, if a
transcript will require the expenditure of public funds;
(C) directions to the clerk, if necessary; and
(D) a designation of that portion of the reporter’s
transcript that supports the statement of judicial acts to be
reviewed, if a transcript will require expenditure of public funds; or
(2) substitute counsel has been obtained or appointed,
or a statement has been filed with the appellate court that the
appellant has exercised the right to self-representation. In publicly
funded cases, the public defender for the local circuit court shall be
appointed initially until the record is transmitted to the appellate
court; or
(3) the time has expired for filing of a notice of appeal,
and no notice has been filed.
Orders allowing withdrawal of counsel are conditional, and counsel
shall remain of record for the limited purpose of representing the
defendant in the lower tribunal regarding any sentencing error that
the lower tribunal is authorized to address during the pendency of
the direct appeal under rule 3.800(b)(2).
RULE 3.131. PRETRIAL RELEASE
(a) Right to Pretrial Release. Unless charged with a capital
offense or an offense punishable by life imprisonment and the proof
of guilt is evident or the presumption is great, every person charged
with a crime or violation of municipal or county ordinance is
entitled to pretrial release on reasonable conditions. As a condition
of pretrial release, whether such release is by surety bail bond or
recognizance bond or in some other form, the defendant must
refrain from any contact of any type with the victim, except through
pretrial discovery under the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
and must comply with all conditions of pretrial release as ordered
by the court. On motion by the defendant when bail is set, or on
later motion properly noticed under law, the court may modify the
condition precluding victim contact if good cause is shown and the
interests of justice so require. The victim is permitted to be heard at
any proceeding in which such modification is considered, and the
state attorney must notify the victim of the provisions of this
subdivision and of the pendency of any such proceeding. If no
conditions of release can reasonably protect the community from
risk of physical harm to persons, assure the presence of the
accused at trial, or assure the integrity of the judicial process, the
accused may be detained.
(b) Pretrial Release Before First Appearance.
(1) A person may be released on bail before his or her
first appearance or bail determination hearing under a local bond
schedule established by the chief judge of the circuit or by the
uniform bond schedule adopted by the Supreme Court in
accordance with subsection 903.011(5), Florida Statutes, if no local
bond schedule has been established, or as ordered by the issuing
judge on an arrest warrant, if applicable.
(2) A person may not be released on bail before his or
her first appearance or bail determination hearing if the person
meets the criteria set forth in subsection 903.011(6), Florida
Statutes.
(c) Hearing at First Appearance—Conditions of Release.
(1) Unless the state has filed a motion for pretrial
detention under rule 3.132, the court must conduct a hearing to
determine pretrial release. For the purpose of this rule, bail is
defined as any of the forms of release stated below. Except as
otherwise provided by this rule, there is a presumption in favor of
release on nonmonetary conditions for any person who is granted
pretrial release. The judicial officer must impose the first of the
following conditions of release that will reasonably protect the
community from risk of physical harm to persons, assure the
presence of the accused at trial, or assure the integrity of the
judicial process; or, if no single condition gives that assurance,
must impose any combination of the following conditions:
(A) personal recognizance of the defendant;
(B) execution of an unsecured appearance bond in
an amount specified by the judge;
(C) release on nonmonetary conditions, which
may, if appropriate, include being required to:
(i) maintain employment, or, if unemployed,
actively seek employment;
(ii) maintain or commence an educational
program;
(iii) abide by specified restrictions on
personal associations, place of residence, or travel;
(iv) report on a regular basis to a designated
law enforcement agency, pretrial services agency, or other agency;
(v) comply with a specified curfew;
(vi) refrain from possessing a firearm,
destructive device, or other dangerous weapon;
(vii) refrain from excessive use of alcohol, or
any use of a narcotic drug or other controlled substance without a
prescription from a licensed medical practitioner;
(viii) undergo available medical, psychological,
psychiatric, mental health, or substance abuse evaluation and
follow all recommendations, including treatment for drug or alcohol
dependency, and remain in a specified institution, if required for
that purpose;
(ix) return to custody for specified hours
following release for employment, school, or other limited purposes;
or
(x) any other condition that is reasonably
necessary to assure the appearance of the defendant at subsequent
proceedings and to protect the community against unreasonable
danger of harm; or
(D) execution of a bail bond with sufficient solvent
sureties, or the deposit of cash; provided, however, that any
criminal defendant who is required to meet monetary bail or bail
with any monetary component may satisfy the bail by providing an
appearance bond.
(2) The judge must at the defendant’s first appearance,
consider all available relevant factors to determine what form of
release is necessary to assure the defendant’s appearance. If a
monetary bail is required, the judge must determine the amount. A
judge conducting a first appearance hearing or bail determination is
not bound by a bond schedule authorized by subsection 903.011(5),
Florida Statutes. Any judge setting or granting monetary bond must
set a separate and specific bail amount for each crime charged.
When bail is posted each crime charged requires a separate bond.
(3) In determining whether to release a defendant on
bail or other conditions, and what that bail or those conditions may
be, the court must consider the nature and circumstances of the
offense charged and the penalty provided by law; the weight of the
evidence against the defendant; the defendant’s family ties, length
of residence in the community, employment history, financial
resources, need for substance abuse evaluation or treatment, and
mental condition; the defendant’s past and present conduct,
including any record of convictions, previous flight to avoid
prosecution, or failure to appear at court proceedings; the nature
and probability of danger that the defendant’s release poses to the
community; the source of funds used to post bail; whether the
defendant is already on release pending resolution of another
criminal proceeding or is on probation, community control, parole,
or other release pending completion of sentence; and any other
facts the court considers relevant.
(4) All information provided by a defendant in
connection with any application for or attempt to secure bail, to any
court, court personnel, or individual soliciting or recording such
information for the purpose of evaluating eligibility for or securing
bail for the defendant, under circumstances such that the
defendant knew or should have known that the information was to
be used in connection with an application for bail, must be
accurate, truthful, and complete, without omissions, to the best
knowledge of the defendant. Failure to comply with the provisions of
this subdivision may result in the revocation or modification of bail.
However, no defendant may be compelled to provide information
regarding his or her criminal record.
(5) Information stated in, or offered in connection with,
any order entered under this rule need not strictly conform to the
rules of evidence.
(d) Consequences of Failure to Appear.
(1) Any defendant who willfully and knowingly fails to
appear and breaches a bond as specified in section 903.26, Florida
Statutes, and who voluntarily appears or surrenders is not eligible
for a recognizance bond.
(2) Any defendant who willfully and knowingly fails to
appear and breaches a bond as specified in section 903.26, Florida
Statutes, and who is arrested at any time following forfeiture is not
eligible for a recognizance bond or any form of bond that does not
require a monetary undertaking or commitment equal to or greater
than $2,000 or twice the value of the monetary commitment or
undertaking of the original bond, whichever is greater.
(e) Subsequent Application for Setting or Modification of
Bail.
(1) When a judicial officer not possessing trial
jurisdiction orders a defendant held to answer before a court having
jurisdiction to try the defendant, and bail has been denied or
sought to be modified, application by motion may be made to the
court having jurisdiction to try the defendant or, in the absence of
the judge of the trial court, to the circuit court. The motion must be
determined promptly. No judge of a court of equal or inferior
jurisdiction may remove a condition of bail or reduce the amount of
bond required, unless the judge:
(A) imposed the conditions of bail or set the
amount of bond required;
(B) is the chief judge of the circuit in which the
defendant is to be tried;
(C) has been assigned to preside over the criminal
trial of the defendant; or
(D) is the first appearance judge and was
authorized by the judge initially setting or denying bail to modify or
set conditions of release.
(2) Applications by the defendant for modification of
bail on any felony charge must be heard by a court in person at a
hearing, with the defendant present and with at least 3 hours’
notice to the state attorney and county attorney, if bond forfeiture
proceedings are handled by the county attorney. The state may
apply for modification of bail by showing good cause and with at
least 3 hours’ notice to the attorney for the defendant.
(3) On motion by the defendant, or on the court’s own
motion, a court may reconsider the monetary component of the
defendant’s bail if he or she is unable to post a monetary bond.
(4) If any trial court fixes bail and refuses its reduction
before trial, the defendant may institute habeas corpus proceedings
seeking reduction of bail. If application is made to the supreme
court or district court of appeal, notice and a copy of such
application must be given to the attorney general and the state
attorney. Such proceedings must be determined promptly.
(f) Bail Before Conviction; Condition of Undertaking.
(1) If a person is admitted to bail for appearance for a
preliminary hearing or on a charge that a judge is empowered to
try, the condition of the undertaking must be that the person will
appear for the hearing or to answer the charge and will submit to
the orders and process of the judge trying the same and will not
depart without leave.
(2) If a person is admitted to bail after being held to
answer by a judge or after an indictment or information on which
the person is to be tried has been filed, the condition of the
undertaking must be that the person will appear to answer the
charges before the court in which the person may be prosecuted
and submit to the orders and process of the court and will not
depart without leave.
(g) Revocation of Pretrial Release.
(1) Any judge presiding at a first appearance hearing
may revoke a defendant’s pretrial release status under section
903.0471, Florida Statutes, on a case not assigned to the first
appearance judge but that is pending in the same judicial circuit as
the first appearance hearing.
(2) The court must revoke pretrial release for a person
who commits a violation of section 843.23, Florida Statutes, while
the person is on pretrial release.
(3) The court in its discretion for good cause, any time
after a defendant who is at large on bail appears for trial, may
commit the defendant to the custody of the proper official to abide
by the judgment, sentence, and any further order of the court.
(h) Arrest and Commitment by Court. The court in which
the cause is pending may direct the arrest and commitment of the
defendant who is at large on bail when:
(1) there has been a breach of the undertaking;
(2) it appears that the defendant’s sureties or any of
them are dead or cannot be found or are insufficient or have ceased
to be residents of the state; or
(3) the court is satisfied that the bail should be
increased or new or additional security required.
The order for the commitment of the defendant must recite
generally the facts on which it is based and must direct that the
defendant be arrested by any official authorized to make arrests
and that the defendant be committed to the official in whose
custody the defendant would be if the defendant had not been given
bail, to be detained by such official until legally discharged. The
defendant must be arrested under such order on a certified copy
thereof, in any county, in the same manner as on a warrant of
arrest. If the order provided for is made because of the failure of the
defendant to appear for judgment, the defendant must be
committed. If the order is made for any other cause, the court may
determine the conditions of release, if any.
(i) Bail after Recommitment. If the defendant applies to be
admitted to bail after recommitment, the court that recommitted
the defendant or the court under subdivision (e)(1) must determine
conditions of release, if any, subject to the limitations of subdivision
(c).
(j) Qualifications of Surety after Order of
Recommitment. If the defendant offers bail after recommitment,
each surety must possess the qualifications and sufficiency and the
bail must be furnished in all respects in the manner prescribed for
admission to bail before recommitment.
(k) Issuance of Capias; Bail Specified. On the filing of
either an indictment or information charging the commission of a
crime, if the person named therein is not in custody or at large on
bail for the offense charged, the judge must issue or direct the clerk
to issue, either immediately or when so directed by the prosecuting
attorney, a capias for the arrest of the person. If the person named
in the indictment or information is a child and the child has been
served with a promise to appear under the Florida Rules of Juvenile
Procedure, capias need not be issued. On the filing of the
indictment or information, the judge must endorse the amount of
bail, if any, and may authorize the setting or modification of bail by
the judge presiding over the defendant’s first appearance hearing.
This endorsement must be made on the capias and signed by the
judge.
(l) Summons on Misdemeanor Charge. When a complaint
is filed charging the commission of a misdemeanor only and the
judge deems that process should issue as a result, or when an
indictment or information on which the defendant is to be tried
charging the commission of a misdemeanor only, and the person
named in it is not in custody or at large on bail for the offense
charged, the judge must direct the clerk to issue a summons
instead of a capias unless the judge has reasonable ground to
believe that the person will not appear in response to a summons,
in which event an arrest warrant or a capias must be issued with
the amount of bail endorsed on it. The summons must state
substantially the nature of the offense, the title of the hearing to be
conducted, and must command the person against whom the
complaint was made to appear before the judge issuing the
summons or the judge having jurisdiction of the offense at a time
and place stated in it.
(m) Summons When Defendant Is Corporation. On the
filing of an indictment or information or complaint charging a
corporation with the commission of a crime, whether felony or
misdemeanor, the judge must direct the clerk to issue or must
issue a summons to secure its appearance to answer the charge. If,
after being summoned, the corporation does not appear, a plea of
not guilty must be entered and trial and judgment must follow
without further process.
RULE 3.132. PRETRIAL DETENTION
(a) First Appearance Required. A person arrested for a
dangerous crime listed in section 907.041, Florida Statutes, or an
unauthorized alien arrested for a forcible felony, must not be
released from jail before his or her first appearance.
(b) Contents of Motion. A motion for pretrial detention
must be in writing and must set forth with particularity the
grounds and the essential facts on which it is based.
(c) Time for Motion. A motion for pretrial detention may be
filed any time before trial.
(d) Time for Hearing. If a judge determines there is probable
cause to believe the defendant committed a capital felony, a life
felony, or a first degree felony, listed as a dangerous crime in section
907.041, Florida Statutes, a pretrial detention hearing must be held
within 5 days after first appearance, or, if there is no first
appearance, within 5 days after arraignment. Otherwise, the
hearing must be held within 5 days after the filing of a motion for
pretrial detention.
(e) Continuances. Either the state or the defendant may
seek a continuance. The state must show good cause for a
continuance. A continuance may not exceed 5 days unless the court
finds that extenuating circumstances justify any further delay, or
upon agreement of the parties with approval of the court. The state
may not be granted more than one continuance.
(f) Custody; Release Conditions.
(1) Dangerous Crime. At first appearance, a judge must
not grant nonmonetary pretrial release if there is probable cause to
believe the defendant committed a dangerous crime listed in section
907.041, Florida Statutes. After first appearance and after a finding
of probable cause, a person arrested for a dangerous crime listed in
section 907.041, Florida Statutes, may not be released on
nonmonetary conditions under the supervision of a pretrial release
service unless the service certifies to the court that it has
investigated or otherwise verified the conditions set forth in section
907.041(3)(b), Florida Statutes.
(2) Unauthorized Aliens. If, at the first appearance
hearing, the court determines there is probable cause to believe the
defendant committed a forcible felony and further determines by a
preponderance of the evidence that the defendant is an
unauthorized alien, the court must presume that the defendant
presents a substantial flight risk and that no conditions of release
will ensure his or her appearance at trial and must order pretrial
detention. The defendant may rebut the presumption by
demonstrating, by a preponderance of the evidence, that
appropriate conditions of release will ensure his or her appearance
at trial. If the court determines the defendant has rebutted the
presumption, it must consider the criteria in section 903.046,
Florida Statutes, and any other relevant facts, to determine whether
to release the defendant on bail or other conditions.
(3) Pretrial Detention Motion Filed at First Appearance.
The defendant may be held in custody pending the completion of a
detention hearing if there is probable cause for the arrest and if the
state filed a motion for pretrial detention at first appearance.
(4) State Announces at First Appearance its Intent to
Move for Pretrial Detention. If there is probable cause for the arrest,
a defendant may be held in jail for up to 4 days if the state informs
the judge at first appearance that it intends to file a motion for
pretrial detention under section 907.041, Florida Statutes. If the
state does not file a motion for pretrial detention within the 4 days,
a judge must determine conditions of release or continued detention
under rule 3.131.
(5) State Does Not Announce Intent to Move for Pretrial
Detention at First Appearance. If there is probable cause for the
arrest and if the state does not inform the judge at first appearance
that it intends to file a motion for pretrial detention under section
907.041, Florida Statutes, the judge must determine conditions of
release or continued detention under rule 3.131.
(6) Pretrial Detention Motion Filed After First
Appearance. If the state filed a motion for pretrial detention after
first appearance and if there is probable cause to believe the
defendant committed the crime for which pretrial detention is
sought, the defendant may be held in custody pending the
completion of the detention hearing, or the judge may issue either
an order to appear or a warrant. The defendant may be held in
custody pending the completion of the detention hearing if he or she
were arrested on a warrant issued under this subdivision. For a
defendant out of custody, if the state is pursuing pretrial detention
under section 907.041, Florida Statutes, the state does not need to
show good cause as required by rule 3.131(d).
(7) Bail Pending Hearing. If a defendant is released on
bail for a dangerous crime that is a capital felony, a life felony, or a
first degree felony pending the completion of a detention hearing,
the court must inform the defendant that if a surety bond is used to
satisfy the monetary component of pretrial release and the motion
for pretrial detention is subsequently granted, the defendant will
not be entitled to return of the premium on the surety bond.
(g) Jurisdiction. A motion for pretrial detention must be
heard by a judge with jurisdiction to conduct the defendant’s trial.
(h) Rights at Hearing. The defendant is entitled to
representation by counsel, to present witnesses and evidence, and
to cross-examine witnesses who testify at the detention hearing. No
testimony by the defendant is admissible to prove guilt at any other
judicial proceeding, but such testimony may be admitted in an
action for perjury, based upon the defendant’s statements made at
the detention hearing, or for impeachment.
(i) Evidence. Evidence secured in violation of the United
States Constitution or the Constitution of the State of Florida is
inadmissible. The rules concerning admissibility of evidence in
criminal trials do not apply to the presentation and consideration of
information at the hearing.
(j) Communication Technology. A judge may allow
testimony using communication technology upon a showing of good
cause. Oaths must be administered in accordance with Florida Rule
of General Practice and Administration 2.530.
(k) Burden of Proof. The state bears the burden of proving
the need for pretrial detention under the substantial probability
standard in section 907.041, Florida Statutes.
(l) Order.
(1) Hearing Required. An order granting or denying
pretrial detention must be issued after a hearing.
(2) Findings. The order may be based solely on hearsay
but must be based solely upon evidence introduced at the hearing
and must be supported by findings of fact and conclusions of law.
The order must be made either in writing or orally on the record
within 24 hours of the conclusion of the hearing.
(3) Mandatory Detention Order. The judge must order
pretrial detention if the judge finds a substantial probability the
defendant committed a capital felony, a life felony, or a first degree
felony, listed as a dangerous crime in section 907.041, Florida
Statutes, and based on the defendant’s past and present patterns of
behavior, consideration of the criteria in section 903.046, Florida
Statutes, and any other relevant facts, that no conditions of release
or bail will reasonably protect the community from risk of physical
harm, ensure the presence of the defendant at trial, or assure the
integrity of the judicial process.
(m) Reconsideration. Either party may move for the order
granting or denying pretrial detention to be reconsidered any time
before trial if the judge finds that information exists that was not
known to the party moving for reconsideration at the time of the
hearing and that such information has a material bearing on
determining whether there are conditions of release or bail that will
reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant as required and
the safety of any other person and the community from harm. The
defendant is entitled to dissolution of a pretrial detention order if
the court finds that a subsequent event eliminated the basis for
detention.
Criminal Court Steering Committee Note
2025 Amendment. Rule 3.132 was substantially revised to reflect
chapters 2023-27 and 2024-157, Laws of Florida. Rule 3.132
applies to pretrial detention under section 907.041, Florida
Statutes. An example of an extenuating circumstance under rule
3.132(e) is the pretrial confinement of the defendant on other
pending charges, or his or her lawful confinement on another
basis.
RULE 3.133. PRETRIAL PROBABLE CAUSE DETERMINATIONS
AND ADVERSARY PRELIMINARY HEARINGS
(a) Nonadversary Probable Cause Determination.
(1) Defendant in Custody. In all cases in which the
defendant is in custody, a nonadversary probable cause
determination shall be held before a judge within 48 hours from the
time of the defendant’s arrest; provided, however, that this
proceeding shall not be required when a probable cause
determination has been previously made by a judge and an arrest
warrant issued for the specific offense for which the defendant is
charged. The judge after a showing of extraordinary circumstance
may continue the proceeding for not more than 24 hours beyond
the 48-hour period. The judge, after a showing that an
extraordinary circumstance still exists, may continue the
proceeding for not more than 24 additional hours following the
expiration of the initial 24-hour continuance. This determination
shall be made if the necessary proof is available at the time of the
first appearance as required under rule 3.130, but the holding of
this determination at that time shall not affect the fact that it is a
nonadversary proceeding.
(2) Defendant on Pretrial Release. A defendant who has
been released from custody before a probable cause determination
is made and who is able to establish that the pretrial release
conditions are a significant restraint on his or her liberty may file a
written motion for a nonadversary probable cause determination
setting forth with specificity the items of significant restraint that a
finding of no probable cause would eliminate. The motion shall be
filed within 21 days from the date of arrest, and notice shall be
given to the state. A judge who finds significant restraints on the
defendant’s liberty shall make a probable cause determination
within 7 days from the filing of the motion.
(3) Standard of Proof. Upon presentation of proof, the
judge shall determine whether there is probable cause for detaining
the arrested person pending further proceedings. The defendant
need not be present. In determining probable cause to detain the
defendant, the judge shall apply the standard for issuance of an
arrest warrant, and the finding may be based on sworn complaint,
affidavit, deposition under oath, or, if necessary, on testimony
under oath properly recorded.
(4) Action on Determination. If probable cause is found,
the defendant shall be held to answer the charges. If probable cause
is not found or the specified time periods are not complied with, the
defendant shall be released from custody unless an information or
indictment has been filed, in which event the defendant shall be
released on recognizance subject to the condition that he or she
appear at all court proceedings or shall be released under a
summons to appear before the appropriate court at a time certain.
Any release occasioned by a failure to comply with the specified
time periods shall be by order of the judge on a written application
filed by the defendant with notice sent to the state or by a judge
without a written application but with notice to the state. The judge
shall order the release of the defendant after it is determined that
the defendant is entitled to release and after the state has a
reasonable period of time, not to exceed 24 hours, in which to
establish probable cause. A release required by this rule does not
void further prosecution by information or indictment but does
prohibit any restraint on liberty other than appearing for trial. A
finding that probable cause does or does not exist shall be made in
writing, signed by the judge, and filed, together with the evidence of
such probable cause, with the clerk of the court having jurisdiction
of the offense for which the defendant is charged.
(b) Adversary Preliminary Hearing.
(1) When Applicable. A defendant who is not charged in
an information or indictment within 21 days from the date of arrest
or service of the capias on him or her shall have a right to an
adversary preliminary hearing on any felony charge then pending
against the defendant. The subsequent filing of an information or
indictment shall not eliminate a defendant’s entitlement to this
proceeding.
(2) Process. The judge shall issue such process as may
be necessary to secure attendance of witnesses within the state for
the state or the defendant.
(3) Witnesses. All witnesses shall be examined in the
presence of the defendant and may be cross-examined. Either party
may request that the witnesses be sequestered. At the conclusion of
the testimony for the prosecution, the defendant who so elects shall
be sworn and testify in his or her own behalf, and in such cases the
defendant shall be warned in advance of testifying that anything he
or she may say can be used against him or her at a subsequent
trial. The defendant may be cross-examined in the same manner as
other witnesses, and any witnesses offered by the defendant shall
be sworn and examined.
(4) Record. At the request of either party, the entire
preliminary hearing, including all testimony, shall be recorded
verbatim stenographically or by mechanical means and at the
request of either party shall be transcribed. If the record of the
proceedings, or any part thereof, is transcribed at the request of the
prosecuting attorney, a copy of this transcript shall be furnished
free of cost to the defendant or the defendant’s counsel.
(5) Action on Hearing. If from the evidence it appears to
the judge that there is probable cause to believe that an offense has
been committed and that the defendant has committed it, the judge
shall cause the defendant to be held to answer to the circuit court;
otherwise, the judge shall release the defendant from custody
unless an information or indictment has been filed, in which event
the defendant shall be released on recognizance subject to the
condition that he or she appear at all court proceedings or shall be
released under a summons to appear before the appropriate court
at a time certain. Such release does not, however, void further
prosecution by information or indictment but does prohibit any
restraint on liberty other than appearing for trial. A finding that
probable cause does or does not exist shall be made in writing,
signed by the judge, and, together with the evidence received in the
cause, shall be filed with the clerk of the circuit court.
(c) Additional Nonadversary Probable Cause
Determinations and Preliminary Hearings. If there has been a
finding of no probable cause at a nonadversary determination or
adversary preliminary hearing, or if the specified time periods for
holding a nonadversary probable cause determination have not
been complied with, a judge may thereafter make a determination of
probable cause at a nonadversary probable cause determination, in
which event the defendant shall be retained in custody or returned
to custody upon appropriate process issued by the judge. A
defendant who has been retained in custody or returned to custody
by such a determination shall be allowed an adversary preliminary
hearing in all instances in which a felony offense is charged.
RULE 3.140. INDICTMENTS; INFORMATIONS
(a) Methods of Prosecution.
(1) Capital Crimes. An offense that may be punished by
death shall be prosecuted by indictment.
(2) Other Crimes. The prosecution of all other criminal
offenses shall be as follows:
In circuit courts and county courts, prosecution shall be solely
by indictment or information, except that prosecution in county
courts for violations of municipal ordinances and metropolitan
county ordinances may be by affidavit or docket entries and
prosecutions for misdemeanors, municipal ordinances, and county
ordinances may be by notice to appear issued and served pursuant
to rule 3.125. A grand jury may indict for any offense. When a
grand jury returns an indictment for an offense not triable in the
circuit court, the circuit judge shall either issue a summons
returnable in the county court or shall bail the accused for trial in
the county court, and the judge, or at the judge’s direction, the
clerk of the circuit court, shall certify the indictment and file it in
the records of the county court.
(b) Nature of Indictment or Information. The indictment
or information on which the defendant is to be tried shall be a
plain, concise, and definite written statement of the essential facts
constituting the offense charged.
(c) Caption, Commencement, Date, and Personal
Statistics.
(1) Caption. No formal caption is essential to the
validity of an indictment or information on which the defendant is
to be tried. Upon objection made as to its absence a caption shall be
prefixed in substantially the following manner:
In the (name of court)
State of Florida versus (name of defendant)
or, in the case of municipal ordinance cases in county court,
City of _____/_____ County versus (name of defendant).
Any defect, error, or omission in a caption may be amended as
of course, at any stage of the proceeding, whether before or after a
plea to the merits, by court order.
(2) Commencement. All indictments or informations on
which the defendant is to be tried shall expressly state that the
prosecution is brought in the name and by the authority of the
State of Florida. Indictments shall state that the defendant is
charged by the grand jury of the county. Informations shall state
that the appropriate prosecuting attorney makes the charge.
(3) Date. Every indictment or information on which the
defendant is to be tried shall bear the date (day, month, year) that it
is filed in each court in which it is so filed.
(4) Personal Statistics. Every indictment or information
shall include the defendant’s race, gender, and date of birth when
any of these facts are known. Failure to include these facts shall
not invalidate an otherwise sufficient indictment or information.
(d) The Charge.
(1) Allegation of Facts; Citation of Law Violated. Each
count of an indictment or information on which the defendant is to
be tried shall allege the essential facts constituting the offense
charged. In addition, each count shall recite the official or
customary citation of the statute, rule, regulation, or other
provision of law that the defendant is alleged to have violated. Error
in or omission of the citation shall not be ground for dismissing the
count or for a reversal of a conviction based thereon if the error or
omission did not mislead the defendant to the defendant’s
prejudice.
(2) Name of Accused. The name of the accused person
shall be stated, if known, and if not known, the person may be
described by any name or description by which the person can be
identified with reasonable certainty. If the grand jury, prosecuting
attorney, or affiant making the charge does not know either the
name of the accused or any name or description by which the
accused can be identified with reasonable certainty, the indictment
or information, as the case may be, shall so allege and the accused
may be charged by a fictitious name.
(3) Time and Place. Each count of an indictment or
information on which the defendant is to be tried shall contain
allegations stating as definitely as possible the time and place of the
commission of the offense charged in the act or transaction or on 2
or more acts or transactions connected together, provided the court
in which the indictment or information is filed has jurisdiction to
try all of the offenses charged.
(4) Allegation of Intent to Defraud. If an intent to
defraud is required as an element of the offense to be charged, it
shall be sufficient to allege an intent to defraud, without naming
therein the particular person or body corporate intended to be
defrauded.
(e) Incorporation by Reference. Allegations made in 1
count shall not be incorporated by reference in another count.
(f) Endorsement and Signature; Indictment. An
indictment shall be signed by the foreperson or the acting
foreperson of the grand jury returning it. The state attorney or
acting state attorney or an assistant state attorney shall make and
sign a statement on the indictment to the effect that he or she has
advised the grand jury returning the indictment as authorized and
required by law. No objection to the indictment on the ground that
the statement has not been made shall be entertained after the
defendant pleads to the merits.
(g) Signature, Oath, and Certification; Information. An
information charging the commission of a felony shall be signed by
the state attorney, or a designated assistant state attorney, under
oath stating his or her good faith in instituting the prosecution and
certifying that he or she has received testimony under oath from the
material witness or witnesses for the offense. An information
charging the commission of a misdemeanor shall be signed by the
state attorney, or a designated assistant state attorney, under oath
stating his or her good faith in instituting the prosecution. No
objection to an information on the ground that it was not signed or
verified, as herein provided, shall be entertained after the defendant
pleads to the merits.
(h) Conclusion. An indictment or information on which the
defendant is to be tried need contain no formal conclusion.
(i) Surplusage. An unnecessary allegation may be
disregarded as surplusage and, on motion of the defendant, may be
stricken from the pleading by the court.
(j) Amendment of Information. An information on which
the defendant is to be tried that charges an offense may be
amended on the motion of the prosecuting attorney or defendant at
any time prior to trial because of formal defects.
(k) Form of Certain Allegations. Allegations concerning the
following items may be alleged as indicated below:
(1) Description of Written Instruments. Instruments
consisting wholly or in part of writing or figures, pictures, or
designs may be described by any term by which they are usually
known or may be identified, without setting forth a copy or facsimile
thereof.
(2) Words; Pictures. Necessary averments relative to
spoken or written words or pictures may be made by the general
purport of such words or pictures without setting forth a copy or
facsimile thereof.
(3) Judgments; Determinations; Proceedings. A
judgment, determination, or proceeding of any court or official, civil
or military, may be alleged generally in such a manner as to identify
the judgment, determination, or proceeding, without alleging facts
conferring jurisdiction on the court or official.
(4) Exceptions; Excuses; Provisos. Statutory exceptions,
excuses, or provisos relative to offenses created or defined by
statute need not be negatived by allegation.
(5) Alternative or Disjunctive Allegations. For an offense
that may be committed by doing 1 or more of several acts, or by 1
or more of several means, or with 1 or more of several intents or
results, it is permissible to allege in the disjunctive or alternative
such acts, means, intents, or results.
(6) Offenses Divided into Degrees. For an offense
divided into degrees it is sufficient to charge the commission of the
offense without specifying the degree.
(7) Felonies. It shall not be necessary to allege that the
offense charged is a felony or was done feloniously.
(l) Custody of Indictment or Information. Unless the
defendant named therein has been previously released on a
citation, order to appear, personal recognizance, or bail, or has been
summoned to appear, or unless otherwise ordered by the court
having jurisdiction, all indictments or informations and the records
thereof shall be in the custody of the clerk of the court to which
they are presented and shall not be inspected by any person other
than the judge, clerk, attorney general, and prosecuting attorney
until the defendant is in custody or until 1 year has elapsed
between the return of an indictment or the filing of an information,
after which time they shall be opened for public inspection.
(m) Defendant’s Right to Copy of Indictment or
Information. Each person who has been indicted or informed
against for an offense shall, on application to the clerk, be
furnished a copy of the indictment or information and the
endorsements thereon, at least 24 hours before being required to
plead to the indictment or information if a copy has not been so
furnished. A failure to furnish a copy shall not affect the validity of
any subsequent proceeding against the defendant if he or she
pleads to the indictment or information.
(n) Statement of Particulars. The court, on motion, shall
order the prosecuting attorney to furnish a statement of particulars
when the indictment or information on which the defendant is to be
tried fails to inform the defendant of the particulars of the offense
sufficiently to enable the defendant to prepare a defense. The
statement of particulars shall specify as definitely as possible the
place, date, and all other material facts of the crime charged that
are specifically requested and are known to the prosecuting
attorney, including the names of persons intended to be defrauded.
Reasonable doubts concerning the construction of this rule shall be
resolved in favor of the defendant.
(o) Defects and Variances. No indictment or information, or
any count thereof, shall be dismissed or judgment arrested, or new
trial granted on account of any defect in the form of the indictment
or information or of misjoinder of offenses or for any cause
whatsoever, unless the court shall be of the opinion that the
indictment or information is so vague, indistinct, and indefinite as
to mislead the accused and embarrass him or her in the
preparation of a defense or expose the accused after conviction or
acquittal to substantial danger of a new prosecution for the same
offense.
RULE 3.170. PLEAS
(a) Types of Plea; Court’s Discretion. A defendant may
plead not guilty, guilty, or, with the consent of the court, nolo
contendere. Except as otherwise provided by these rules, all pleas to
a charge shall be in open court and shall be entered by the
defendant. If the sworn complaint charges the commission of a
misdemeanor, the defendant may plead guilty to the charge at the
first appearance under rule 3.130, and the judge may thereupon
enter judgment and sentence without the necessity of any further
formal charges being filed. A plea of not guilty may be entered in
writing by counsel. Every plea shall be entered of record, but a
failure to enter it shall not affect the validity of any proceeding in
the cause.
(b) Pleading to Other Charges. Having entered a plea in
accordance with this rule, the defendant may, with the court’s
permission, enter a plea of guilty or nolo contendere to any and all
charges pending against him or her in the State of Florida over
which the court would have jurisdiction and, when authorized by
law, to charges pending in a court of lesser jurisdiction, if the
prosecutor in the other case or cases gives written consent thereto.
The court accepting such a plea shall make a disposition of all such
charges by judgment, sentence, or otherwise. The record of the plea
and its disposition shall be filed in the court of original jurisdiction
of the offense. If a defendant secures permission to plead to other
pending charges and does so plead, the entry of such a plea shall
constitute a waiver by the defendant of venue and all
nonjurisdictional defects relating to such charges.
(c) Standing Mute or Pleading Evasively. If a defendant
stands mute, or pleads evasively, a plea of not guilty shall be
entered.
(d) Failure of Corporation to Appear. If the defendant is a
corporation and fails to appear, a plea of not guilty shall be entered
of record.
(e) Plea of Not Guilty; Operation in Denial. A plea of not
guilty is a denial of every material allegation in the indictment or
information on which the defendant is to be tried.
(f) Withdrawal of Plea of Guilty or No Contest. The court
may in its discretion, and shall on good cause, at any time before a
sentence, permit a plea of guilty or no contest to be withdrawn and,
if judgment of conviction has been entered thereon, set aside the
judgment and allow a plea of not guilty, or, with the consent of the
prosecuting attorney, allow a plea of guilty or no contest of a lesser
included offense, or of a lesser degree of the offense charged, to be
substituted for the plea of guilty or no contest. The fact that a
defendant may have entered a plea of guilty or no contest and later
withdrawn the plea may not be used against the defendant in a trial
of that cause.
(g) Vacation of Plea and Sentence Due to Defendant’s
Noncompliance.
(1) Whenever a plea agreement requires the defendant
to comply with some specific terms, those terms shall be expressly
made a part of the plea entered into in open court.
(2) Unless otherwise stated at the time the plea is
entered:
(A) The state may move to vacate a plea and
sentence within 60 days of the defendant’s noncompliance with the
specific terms of a plea agreement.
(B) When a motion is filed pursuant to subdivision
(g)(2)(A) of this rule, the court shall hold an evidentiary hearing on
the issue unless the defendant admits noncompliance with the
specific terms of the plea agreement.
(C) No plea or sentence shall be vacated unless
the court finds that there has been substantial noncompliance with
the express plea agreement.
(D) When a plea and sentence is vacated pursuant
to this rule, the cause shall be set for trial within 90 days of the
order vacating the plea and sentence.
(h) Plea of Guilty to Lesser Included Offense or Lesser
Degree. The defendant, with the consent of the court and of the
prosecuting attorney, may plead guilty to any lesser offense than
that charged that is included in the offense charged in the
indictment or information or to any lesser degree of the offense
charged.
(i) Plea of Guilty to an Offense Divided into Degrees;
Determination of the Degree. When an indictment or information
charges an offense that is divided into degrees without specifying
the degree, if the defendant pleads guilty, generally the court shall,
before accepting the plea, examine witnesses to determine the
degree of the offense of which the defendant is guilty.
(j) Time and Circumstances of Plea. No defendant,
whether represented by counsel or otherwise, shall be called on to
plead unless and until he or she has had a reasonable time within
which to deliberate thereon.
(k) Responsibility of Court on Pleas. No plea of guilty or
nolo contendere shall be accepted by a court without the court first
determining, in open court, with means of recording the
proceedings stenographically or mechanically, that the
circumstances surrounding the plea reflect a full understanding of
the significance of the plea and its voluntariness and that there is a
factual basis for the plea of guilty. A complete record of the
proceedings at which a defendant pleads shall be kept by the court.
(l) Motion to Withdraw the Plea after Sentencing. A
defendant who pleads guilty or nolo contendere without expressly
reserving the right to appeal a legally dispositive issue may file a
motion to withdraw the plea within thirty days after rendition of the
sentence, but only upon the grounds specified in Florida Rule of
Appellate Procedure 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)(a)–(e) except as provided by
law.
(m) Motion to Withdraw the Plea after Drug Court
Transfer. A defendant who pleads guilty or nolo contendere to a
charge for the purpose of transferring the case, pursuant to section
910.035, Florida Statutes, may file a motion to withdraw the plea
upon successful completion of the drug court treatment program.
RULE 3.190. PRETRIAL MOTIONS
(a) In General. Every pretrial motion and pleading in
response to a motion shall be in writing and signed by the party
making the motion or the attorney for the party. This requirement
may be waived by the court for good cause shown. Each motion or
other pleading shall state the ground or grounds on which it is
based. A copy shall be served on the adverse party. A certificate of
service must accompany the filing of any pleading.
(b) Motion to Dismiss; Grounds. All defenses available to a
defendant by plea, other than not guilty, shall be made only by
motion to dismiss the indictment or information, whether the same
shall relate to matters of form, substance, former acquittal, former
jeopardy, or any other defense.
(c) Time for Moving to Dismiss. Unless the court grants
further time, the defendant shall move to dismiss the indictment or
information either before or at arraignment. The court in its
discretion may permit the defendant to plead and thereafter to file a
motion to dismiss at a time to be set by the court. Except for
objections based on fundamental grounds, every ground for a
motion to dismiss that is not presented by a motion to dismiss
within the time provided herein, shall be considered waived.
However, the court may at any time entertain a motion to dismiss
on any of the following grounds:
(1) The defendant is charged with an offense for which
the defendant has been pardoned.
(2) The defendant is charged with an offense for which
the defendant previously has been placed in jeopardy.
(3) The defendant is charged with an offense for which
the defendant previously has been granted immunity.
(4) There are no material disputed facts and the
undisputed facts do not establish a prima facie case of guilt against
the defendant.
The facts on which the motion is based should be alleged
specifically and the motion sworn to.
(d) Traverse or Demurrer. The state may traverse or demur
to a motion to dismiss that alleges factual matters. Factual matters
alleged in a motion to dismiss under subdivision (c)(4) of this rule
shall be considered admitted unless specifically denied by the state
in the traverse. The court may receive evidence on any issue of fact
necessary to the decision on the motion. A motion to dismiss under
subdivision (c)(4) of this rule shall be denied if the state files a
traverse that, with specificity, denies under oath the material fact or
facts alleged in the motion to dismiss. The demurrer or traverse
shall be filed a reasonable time before the hearing on the motion to
dismiss.
(e) Effect of Sustaining a Motion to Dismiss. If the motion
to dismiss is sustained, the court may order that the defendant be
held in custody or admitted to bail for a reasonable specified time
pending the filing of a new indictment or information. If a new
indictment or information is not filed within the time specified in
the order, or within such additional time as the court may allow for
good cause shown, the defendant, if in custody, shall be discharged,
unless some other charge justifies a continuation in custody. If the
defendant has been released on bail, the defendant and the sureties
shall be exonerated; if money or bonds have been deposited as bail,
the money or bonds shall be refunded.
(f) Motion for Continuance.
(1) Definition. A continuance within the meaning of this
rule is the postponement of a cause for any period of time.
(2) Cause. On motion of the state or a defendant or on
its own motion, the court may grant a continuance, in its discretion
for good cause shown.
(3) Time for Filing. A motion for continuance may be
made only before or at the time the case is set for trial, unless good
cause for failure to so apply is shown or the ground for the motion
arose after the cause was set for trial.
(4) Certificate of Good Faith. A motion for continuance
shall be accompanied by a certificate of the movant’s counsel that
the motion is made in good faith.
(5) Affidavits. The party applying for a continuance may
file affidavits in support of the motion, and the adverse party may
file counter-affidavits in opposition to the motion.
(g) Motion to Suppress Evidence in Unlawful Search.
(1) Grounds. A defendant aggrieved by an unlawful
search and seizure may move to suppress anything so obtained for
use as evidence because:
(A) the property was illegally seized without a
warrant;
(B) the warrant is insufficient on its face;
(C) the property seized is not the property
described in the warrant;
(D) there was no probable cause for believing the
existence of the grounds on which the warrant was issued; or
(E) the warrant was illegally executed.
(2) Contents of Motion. Every motion to suppress
evidence shall state clearly the particular evidence sought to be
suppressed, the reasons for suppression, and a general statement
of the facts on which the motion is based.
(3) Hearing. Before hearing evidence, the court shall
determine if the motion is legally sufficient. If it is not, the motion
shall be denied. If the court hears the motion on its merits, the
defendant shall present evidence supporting the defendant’s
position and the state may offer rebuttal evidence.
(4) Time for Filing. The motion to suppress shall be
made before trial unless opportunity therefor did not exist or the
defendant was not aware of the grounds for the motion, but the
court may entertain the motion or an appropriate objection at the
trial.
(h) Motion to Suppress a Confession or Admission
Illegally Obtained.
(1) Grounds. On motion of the defendant or on its own
motion, the court shall suppress any confession or admission
obtained illegally from the defendant.
(2) Contents of Motion. Every motion made by a
defendant to suppress a confession or admission shall identify with
particularity any statement sought to be suppressed, the reasons
for suppression, and a general statement of the facts on which the
motion is based.
(3) Time for Filing. The motion to suppress shall be
made before trial unless opportunity therefor did not exist or the
defendant was not aware of the grounds for the motion, but the
court in its discretion may entertain the motion or an appropriate
objection at the trial.
(4) Hearing. The court shall receive evidence on any
issue of fact necessary to be decided to rule on the motion.
(i) Motion to Take Deposition to Perpetuate Testimony.
(1) After the filing of an indictment or information on
which a defendant is to be tried, the defendant or the state may
apply for an order to perpetuate testimony. The application shall be
verified or supported by the affidavits of credible persons that a
prospective witness resides beyond the territorial jurisdiction of the
court or may be unable to attend or be prevented from attending a
trial or hearing, that the witness’s testimony is material, and that it
is necessary to take the deposition to prevent a failure of justice.
The court shall order a commission to be issued to take the
deposition of the witnesses to be used in the trial and that any
nonprivileged designated books, papers, documents, or tangible
objects be produced at the same time and place. If the application is
made within 10 days before the trial date, the court may deny the
application.
(2) If the defendant or the state desires to perpetuate
the testimony of a witness living in or out of the state whose
testimony is material and necessary to the case, the same
proceedings shall be followed as provided in subdivision (i)(1), but
the testimony of the witness may be taken before an official court
reporter, transcribed by the reporter, and filed in the trial court.
(3) If the deposition is taken on the application of the
state, the defendant and the defendant’s attorney shall be given
reasonable notice of the time and place set for the deposition. The
officer having custody of the defendant shall be notified of the time
and place and shall produce the defendant at the examination and
keep the defendant in the presence of the witness during the
examination. A defendant not in custody may be present at the
examination, but the failure to appear after notice and tender of
expenses shall constitute a waiver of the right to be present. The
state shall pay to the defendant’s attorney and to a defendant not in
custody the expenses of travel and subsistence for attendance at
the examination. The state shall make available to the defendant for
examination and use at the deposition any statement of the witness
being deposed that is in the possession of the state and that the
state would be required to make available to the defendant if the
witness were testifying at trial.
(4) The application and order to issue the commission
may be made either in term time or in vacation. The commission
shall be issued at a time to be fixed by the court.
(5) Except as otherwise provided, the rules governing
the taking and filing of oral depositions, the objections thereto, the
issuing, execution, and return of the commission, and the opening
of the depositions in civil actions shall apply in criminal cases.
(6) No deposition shall be used or read into evidence
when the attendance of the witness can be procured. If the court
determines that any person whose deposition has been taken is
absent because of procurement, inducement, or threats of any
person on behalf of the state or of the defendant or of any person on
the defendant’s behalf, the deposition shall not be read in evidence
on behalf of the defendant.
(j) Motion to Expedite. On motion by the state, the court,
in the exercise of its discretion, shall take into consideration the
dictates of sections 825.106 and 918.0155, Florida Statutes (1995).
RULE 3.191. SPEEDY TRIAL
(a) Speedy Trial without Demand. Except as otherwise
provided by this rule, and subject to the limitations imposed under
subdivisions (e) and (f), every person charged with a crime shall be
brought to trial within 90 days if the crime charged is a
misdemeanor, or within 175 days if the crime charged is a felony. If
trial is not commenced within these time periods, the defendant
shall be entitled to the appropriate remedy as set forth in
subdivision (o). The time periods established by this subdivision
shall commence when the person is formally charged with a crime
as defined under subdivision (d). A person charged with a crime is
entitled to the benefits of this rule whether the person is in custody
in a jail or correctional institution of this state or a political
subdivision thereof or is at liberty on bail or recognizance or other
pretrial release condition. This subdivision shall cease to apply
whenever a person files a valid demand for speedy trial under
subdivision (b).
(b) Speedy Trial upon Demand. Except as otherwise
provided by this rule, and subject to the limitations imposed under
subdivisions (e) and (g), every person charged with a crime by
indictment or information shall have the right to demand a trial
within 60 days, by filing with the court a separate pleading entitled
“Demand for Speedy Trial,” and serving a copy on the prosecuting
authority.
(1) No later than 5 days from the filing of a demand for
speedy trial, the court shall hold a calendar call, with notice to all
parties, for the express purposes of announcing in open court
receipt of the demand and of setting the case for trial.
(2) At the calendar call the court shall set the case for
trial to commence at a date no less than 5 days nor more than 60
days from the date of the filing of the demand.
(3) The failure of the court to hold a calendar call on a
demand that has been properly filed and served shall not interrupt
the running of any time periods under this subdivision.
(4) If the defendant has not been brought to trial within
60 days of the filing of the demand, the defendant shall have the
right to the appropriate remedy as set forth in subdivision (o).
(c) Commencement of Trial. A person shall be considered
to have been brought to trial if the trial commences within the time
herein provided. The trial is considered to have commenced when
the trial jury panel for that specific trial is sworn for voir dire
examination or, on waiver of a jury trial, when the trial proceedings
begin before the judge.
(d) Formally Charged. For the purposes of this rule, a
person is formally charged with a crime by information, or by
indictment, or in the case of alleged misdemeanors by whatever
documents constitute a formal charge.
(e) Prisoners outside Jurisdiction. A person who is in
federal custody or incarcerated in a jail or correctional institution
outside the jurisdiction of this state or a subdivision thereof, and
who is charged with a crime, is not entitled to the benefit of this
rule until that person returns or is returned to the jurisdiction of
the court within which the Florida charge is pending and until
written notice of the person’s return is filed with the court and
served on the prosecutor. For these persons, the time period under
subdivision (a) commences on the date the last act required under
this subdivision occurs. For these persons the time period under
subdivision (b) commences when the demand is filed so long as the
acts required under this subdivision occur before the filing of the
demand. If the acts required under this subdivision do not precede
the filing of the demand, the demand is invalid and shall be
stricken upon motion of the prosecuting attorney. Nothing in this
rule shall affect a prisoner’s right to speedy trial under law.
(f) Consolidation of Felony and Misdemeanor. When a
felony and a misdemeanor are consolidated for disposition in circuit
court, the misdemeanor shall be governed by the same time period
applicable to the felony.
(g) Demand for Speedy Trial; Accused Is Bound. A
demand for speedy trial binds the accused and the state. No
demand for speedy trial shall be filed or served unless the accused
has a bona fide desire to obtain a trial sooner than otherwise might
be provided. A demand for speedy trial shall be considered a
pleading that the accused is available for trial, has diligently
investigated the case, and is prepared or will be prepared for trial
within 5 days. A demand filed by an accused who has not diligently
investigated the case or who is not timely prepared for trial shall be
stricken as invalid on motion of the prosecuting attorney. A demand
may not be withdrawn by the accused except on order of the court,
with consent of the state or on good cause shown. Good cause for
continuances or delay on behalf of the accused thereafter shall not
include nonreadiness for trial, except as to matters that may arise
after the demand for trial is filed and that reasonably could not
have been anticipated by the accused or counsel for the accused. A
person who has demanded speedy trial, who thereafter is not
prepared for trial, is not entitled to continuance or delay except as
provided in this rule.
(h) Notice of Expiration of Time for Speedy Trial; When
Timely. A notice of expiration of speedy trial time shall be timely if
filed and served after the expiration of the periods of time for trial
provided in this rule. However, a notice of expiration of speedy trial
time filed before expiration of the period of time for trial is invalid
and shall be stricken on motion of the prosecuting attorney.
(i) When Time May Be Extended. The periods of time
established by this rule may be extended, provided the period of
time sought to be extended has not expired at the time the
extension was procured. An extension may be procured by:
(1) stipulation, announced to the court or signed in
proper person or by counsel, by the party against whom the
stipulation is sought to be enforced;
(2) written or recorded order of the court on the court’s
own motion or motion by either party in exceptional circumstances
as hereafter defined in subdivision (l);
(3) written or recorded order of the court with good
cause shown by the accused;
(4) written or recorded order of the court for a period of
reasonable and necessary delay resulting from proceedings
including but not limited to an examination and hearing to
determine the mental competency or physical ability of the
defendant to stand trial, for hearings on pretrial motions, for
appeals by the state, for DNA testing ordered on the defendant’s
behalf upon defendant’s motion specifying the physical evidence to
be tested pursuant to section 925.12(2), Florida Statutes, and for
trial of other pending criminal charges against the accused; or
(5) administrative order issued by the chief justice,
under Florida Rule of General Practice and Judicial Administration
2.205(a)(2)(B)(iv) or (v), suspending the speedy trial procedures as
stated therein.
(j) Delay and Continuances; Effect on Motion. If trial of
the accused does not commence within the periods of time
established by this rule, a pending motion for discharge shall be
granted by the court unless it is shown that:
(1) a time extension has been ordered under
subdivision (i) and that extension has not expired;
(2) the failure to hold trial is attributable to the
accused, a codefendant in the same trial, or their counsel;
(3) the accused was unavailable for trial under
subdivision (k); or
(4) the demand referred to in subdivision (g) is invalid.
If the court finds that discharge is not appropriate for reasons
under subdivisions (j)(2), (j)(3), or (j)(4), the pending motion for
discharge shall be denied, provided, however, that trial shall be
scheduled and commence within 90 days of a written or recorded
order of denial.
(k) Availability for Trial. A person is unavailable for trial if
the person or the person’s counsel fails to attend a proceeding at
which either’s presence is required by these rules, or the person or
counsel is not ready for trial on the date trial is scheduled. A person
who has not been available for trial during the term provided for in
this rule is not entitled to be discharged. No presumption of
nonavailability attaches, but if the state objects to discharge and
presents any evidence tending to show nonavailability, the accused
must establish, by competent proof, availability during the term.
(l) Exceptional Circumstances. As permitted by
subdivision (i) of this rule, the court may order an extension of the
time periods provided under this rule when exceptional
circumstances are shown to exist. Exceptional circumstances may
not include general congestion of the court’s docket, lack of diligent
preparation, failure to obtain available witnesses, or other avoidable
or foreseeable delays. Exceptional circumstances are those that, as
a matter of substantial justice to the accused or the state or both,
require an order by the court. These circumstances include, but are
not limited to:
(1) unexpected illness, unexpected incapacity, or
unforeseeable and unavoidable absence of a person whose presence
or testimony is uniquely necessary for a full and adequate trial;
(2) a showing by the state that the case is so unusual
and so complex, because of the number of defendants or the nature
of the prosecution or otherwise, that it is unreasonable to expect
adequate investigation or preparation within the periods of time
established by this rule;
(3) a showing by the state that specific evidence or
testimony is not available despite diligent efforts to secure it, but
will become available at a later time;
(4) a showing by the accused or the state of necessity
for delay grounded on developments that could not have been
anticipated and that materially will affect the trial;
(5) a showing that a delay is necessary to accommodate
a codefendant, when there is reason not to sever the cases to
proceed promptly with trial of the defendant; or
(6) a showing by the state that the accused has caused
major delay or disruption of preparation of proceedings, as by
preventing the attendance of witnesses or otherwise.
(m) Effect of Mistrial; Appeal; Order of New Trial. A person
who is to be tried again or whose trial has been delayed by an
appeal by the state or the defendant shall be brought to trial within
90 days from the date of declaration of a mistrial by the trial court,
the date of an order by the trial court granting a new trial, the date
of an order by the trial court granting a motion in arrest of
judgment, or the date of receipt by the trial court of a mandate,
order, or notice of whatever form from a reviewing court that makes
possible a new trial for the defendant, whichever is last in time. If a
defendant is not brought to trial within the prescribed time periods,
the defendant shall be entitled to the appropriate remedy as set
forth in subdivision (o).
(n) Discharge with Prejudice from Crime; Effect.
Discharge with prejudice from a crime under this rule shall operate
to bar prosecution of the crime charged and of all other crimes on
which trial has not commenced nor conviction obtained nor
adjudication withheld and that were or might have been charged as
a result of the same conduct or criminal episode as a lesser degree
or lesser included offense.
(o) Remedy for Failure to Try Defendant within the
Specified Time.
(1) No remedy shall be granted to any defendant under
this rule until the court has made the required inquiry under
subdivision (j).
(2) At any time after the expiration of the prescribed
time period, the defendant may file a separate pleading entitled
“Notice of Expiration of Speedy Trial Time,” and serve a copy on the
prosecuting authority.
(3) No later than 5 days from the date of the filing of a
notice of expiration of speedy trial time, the court shall hold a
hearing on the notice and, unless the court finds that one of the
reasons set forth in subdivision (j) exists, shall order that the
defendant be brought to trial within 30 days. This recapture period
is mandatory before any remedy will be given under this rule. A
defendant not brought to trial within the 30-day period through no
fault of the defendant, on motion of the defendant, shall be
discharged from the crime. This discharge shall be without
prejudice unless there is a determination that the defendant’s
constitutional right to speedy trial has been violated. If there is a
determination that the constitutional speedy trial right has been
violated, discharge shall be with prejudice as set forth in
subdivision (n).
RULE 3.220. DISCOVERY
(a) Notice of Discovery. After the filing of the charging
document, a defendant may elect to participate in the discovery
process provided by these rules, including the taking of discovery
depositions, by filing with the court and serving on the prosecuting
attorney a “Notice of Discovery” which binds both the prosecution
and defendant to all discovery procedures contained in these rules.
Participation by a defendant in the discovery process, including the
taking of any deposition by a defendant or the filing of a public
records request under chapter 119, Florida Statutes, for law
enforcement records relating to the defendant’s pending
prosecution, which are nonexempt as a result of a codefendant’s
participation in discovery, is an election to participate in discovery
and triggers a reciprocal discovery obligation for the defendant. If
any defendant knowingly or purposely shares in discovery obtained
by a codefendant, the defendant is deemed to have elected to
participate in discovery.
(b) Prosecutor’s Discovery Obligation.
(1) Within 15 days after service of the Notice of
Discovery, the prosecutor must serve a written Discovery Exhibit
which must disclose to the defendant and permit the defendant to
inspect, copy, test, and photograph the following information and
material within the state’s possession or control, except that any
property or material that portrays sexual performance by a child,
constitutes generated child pornography, or constitutes child
pornography may not be copied, photographed, duplicated, or
otherwise reproduced so long as the state attorney makes the
property or material reasonably available to the defendant or the
defendant’s attorney:
(A) a list of the names and addresses of all
persons known to the prosecutor to have information that may be
relevant to any offense charged or any defense thereto, or to any
similar fact evidence to be presented at trial under section
90.404(2), Florida Statutes. The names and addresses of persons
listed must be clearly designated in the following categories:
(i) Category A. These witnesses must
include (1) eye witnesses, (2) alibi witnesses and rebuttal to alibi
witnesses, (3) witnesses who were present when a recorded or
unrecorded statement was taken from or made by a defendant or
codefendant, which must be separately identified within this
category, (4) investigating officers, (5) witnesses known by the
prosecutor to have any material information that tends to negate
the guilt of the defendant as to any offense charged, (6) child
hearsay witnesses, (7) expert witnesses who have not provided a
written report and a curriculum vitae or who are going to testify,
and (8) informant witnesses, whether in custody, who offer
testimony concerning the statements of a defendant about the
issues for which the defendant is being tried.
(ii) Category B. All witnesses not listed in
either Category A or Category C.
(iii) Category C. All witnesses who performed
only ministerial functions or whom the prosecutor does not intend
to call at trial and whose involvement with and knowledge of the
case is fully set out in a police report or other statement furnished
to the defense;
(B) the statement of any person whose name is
furnished in compliance with the preceding subdivision. The term
“statement” as used herein includes a written statement made by
the person and signed or otherwise adopted or approved by the
person and also includes any statement of any kind or manner
made by the person and written or recorded or summarized in any
writing or recording. The term “statement” is specifically intended to
include all police and investigative reports of any kind prepared for
or in connection with the case, but must not include the notes from
which those reports are compiled;
(C) any written or recorded statements and the
substance of any oral statements made by the defendant, including
a copy of any statements contained in police reports or report
summaries, together with the name and address of each witness to
the statements;
(D) any written or recorded statements and the
substance of any oral statements made by a codefendant;
(E) those portions of recorded grand jury minutes
that contain testimony of the defendant;
(F) any tangible papers or objects that were
obtained from or belonged to the defendant;
(G) whether the state has any material or
information that has been provided by a confidential informant;
(H) whether there has been any electronic
surveillance, including wiretapping, of the premises of the
defendant or of conversations to which the defendant was a party
and any documents relating thereto;
(I) whether there has been any search or seizure
and any documents relating thereto;
(J) reports or statements of experts made in
connection with the particular case, including results of physical or
mental examinations and of scientific tests, experiments, or
comparisons;
(K) any tangible papers or objects that the
prosecuting attorney intends to use in the hearing or trial and that
were not obtained from or that did not belong to the defendant;
(L) any tangible paper, objects, or substances in
the possession of law enforcement that could be tested for DNA;
and
(M) whether the state has any material or
information that has been provided by an informant witness,
including:
(i) the substance of any statement allegedly
made by the defendant about which the informant witness may
testify;
(ii) a summary of the criminal history record
of the informant witness;
(iii) the time and place under which the
defendant’s alleged statement was made;
(iv) whether the informant witness has
received, or expects to receive, anything in exchange for his or her
testimony;
(v) the informant witness’s prior history of
cooperation, in return for any benefit, as known to the prosecutor.
(2) If the court determines, in camera, that any police
or investigative report contains irrelevant, sensitive information or
information interrelated with other crimes or criminal activities and
the disclosure of the contents of the police report may seriously
impair law enforcement or jeopardize the investigation of those
other crimes or activities, the court may prohibit or partially restrict
the disclosure.
(3) The court may prohibit the state from introducing
into evidence any of the foregoing material not disclosed, so as to
secure and maintain fairness in the just determination of the cause.
(4) As soon as practicable after the filing of the
charging document the prosecutor must disclose to the defendant
any material information within the state’s possession or control
that tends to negate the guilt of the defendant as to any offense
charged, regardless of whether the defendant has incurred
reciprocal discovery obligations.
(c) Disclosure to Prosecution.
(1) After the filing of the charging document and
subject to constitutional limitations, the court may require a
defendant to:
(A) appear in a lineup;
(B) speak for identification by witnesses to an
offense;
(C) be fingerprinted;
(D) pose for photographs not involving re-
enactment of a scene;
(E) try on articles of clothing;
(F) permit the taking of specimens of material
under the defendant’s fingernails;
(G) permit the taking of samples of the defendant’s
blood, hair, and other materials of the defendant’s body that
involves no unreasonable intrusion thereof;
(H) provide specimens of the defendant’s
handwriting; and
(I) submit to a reasonable physical or medical
inspection of the defendant’s body.
(2) If the personal appearance of a defendant is
required for the foregoing purposes, reasonable notice of the time
and location of the appearance must be given by the prosecuting
attorney to the defendant and his or her counsel. Provisions may be
made for appearances for such purposes in an order admitting a
defendant to bail or providing for pretrial release.
(d) Defendant’s Obligation.
(1) If a defendant elects to participate in discovery,
either through filing the appropriate notice or by participating in
any discovery process, including the taking of a discovery
deposition, the following disclosures must be made:
(A) Within 15 days after receipt by the defendant
of the Discovery Exhibit furnished by the prosecutor under
subdivision (b)(1)(A) of this rule, the defendant must furnish to the
prosecutor a written list of the names and addresses of all
witnesses whom the defendant expects to call as witnesses at the
trial or hearing. When the prosecutor subpoenas a witness whose
name has been furnished by the defendant, except for trial
subpoenas, the rules applicable to the taking of depositions apply.
(B) Within 15 days after receipt of the prosecutor’s
Discovery Exhibit the defendant must serve a written Discovery
Exhibit which must disclose to and permit the prosecutor to
inspect, copy, test, and photograph the following information and
material that is in the defendant’s possession or control:
(i) the statement of any person listed in
subdivision (d)(1)(A), other than that of the defendant;
(ii) reports or statements of experts, that the
defendant intends to use as a witness at a trial or hearing, made in
connection with the particular case, including results of physical or
mental examinations and of scientific tests, experiments, or
comparisons; and
(iii) any tangible papers or objects that the
defendant intends to use in the hearing or trial.
(2) The prosecutor and the defendant must perform
their obligations under this rule in a manner mutually agreeable or
as ordered by the court.
(3) The filing of a motion for protective order by the
prosecutor will automatically stay the times provided for in this
subdivision. If a protective order is granted, the defendant may,
within 2 days thereafter, or at any time before the prosecutor
furnishes the information or material that is the subject of the
motion for protective order, withdraw the defendant’s notice of
discovery and not be required to furnish reciprocal discovery.
(e) Restricting Disclosure. The court on its own initiative or
on motion of counsel must deny or partially restrict disclosures
authorized by this rule if it finds there is a substantial risk to any
person of physical harm, intimidation, bribery, economic reprisals,
or unnecessary annoyance or embarrassment resulting from the
disclosure, that outweighs any usefulness of the disclosure to either
party.
(f) Additional Discovery. On a showing of materiality, the
court may require such other discovery to the parties as justice may
require.
(g) Matters Not Subject to Disclosure.
(1) Work Product. Disclosure must not be required of
legal research or of records, correspondence, reports, or
memoranda to the extent that they contain the opinions, theories,
or conclusions of the prosecuting or defense attorney or members of
their legal staffs.
(2) Informants. Disclosure of a confidential informant
must not be required unless the confidential informant is to be
produced at a hearing or trial or a failure to disclose the informant’s
identity will infringe the constitutional rights of the defendant.
(h) Discovery Depositions.
(1) Generally. At any time after the filing of the charging
document any party may take the deposition on oral examination of
any person authorized by this rule. A party taking a deposition
must give reasonable written notice to each other party and must
make a good faith effort to coordinate the date, time, and location of
the deposition to accommodate the schedules of other parties and
the witness to be deposed. The notice must state the time and the
location where the deposition is to be taken, the name of each
person to be examined, and a certificate of counsel that a good faith
effort was made to coordinate the deposition schedule. Unless a
provision of this rule conflicts with the Florida Rules of Civil
Procedure, the procedure for taking the deposition, including the
scope of the examination, and the issuance of a subpoena for
deposition by an attorney of record in the action, is the same as
that provided in the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure and section
48.031, Florida Statutes. To protect deponents and the rights of the
parties and to ensure compliance with statutes, the court may enter
orders, including but not limited to the orders allowed by rule
3.220(e) and (l), on motion of a party, the deponent, or on its own
motion, for good cause shown. Any deposition taken under this rule
may be used by any party for the purpose of contradicting or
impeaching the testimony of the deponent as a witness. The trial
court or the clerk of the court may, upon application by a pro se
litigant or the attorney for any party, issue subpoenas for the
persons whose depositions are to be taken. In any case, including
multiple defendants or consolidated cases, no person may be
deposed more than once except by consent of the parties or by
order of the court issued on good cause shown. A witness who
refuses to obey a duly served subpoena may be adjudged in
contempt of the court from which the subpoena issued.
(A) The defendant may, without leave of court,
take the deposition of any witness listed by the prosecutor as a
Category A witness or listed by a co-defendant as a witness to be
called at a joint trial or hearing. After receipt by the defendant of
the Discovery Exhibit, the defendant may, without leave of court,
take the deposition of any unlisted witness who may have
information relevant to the offense charged. The prosecutor may,
without leave of court, take the deposition of any witness listed by
the defendant to be called at a trial or hearing.
(B) No party may take the deposition of a witness
listed by the prosecutor as a Category B witness except on leave of
court with good cause shown. In determining whether to allow a
deposition, the court should consider the consequences to the
defendant, the complexities of the issues involved, the complexity of
the testimony of the witness (e.g., experts), and the other
opportunities available to the defendant to discover the information
sought by deposition.
(C) A witness listed by the prosecutor as a
Category C witness is not subject to deposition unless the court
determines that the witness should be listed in another category.
(D) No deposition may be taken in a case in which
the defendant is charged only with a misdemeanor or a criminal
traffic offense when all other discovery provided by this rule has
been complied with unless good cause can be shown to the trial
court. In determining whether to allow a deposition, the court
should consider the consequences to the defendant, the complexity
of the issues involved, the complexity of the witness’s testimony
(e.g., experts), and the other opportunities available to the
defendant to discover the information sought by deposition.
However, this prohibition against the taking of depositions does not
apply if following the furnishing of discovery by the defendant the
state then takes the statement of a listed defense witness under
section 27.04, Florida Statutes.
(2) Transcripts. No transcript of a deposition for which
the state may be obligated to expend funds may be ordered by a
party unless it is in compliance with general law.
(3) Location of Deposition. Unless the deposition will be
taken by communication technology, depositions of witnesses
residing:
(A) in the county in which the trial is to take place
must be taken in the building in which the trial will be held, such
other location as is agreed on by the parties, or a location
designated by the court; or
(B) outside the county in which the trial is to take
place must be taken in a court reporter’s office in the county or
state in which the witness resides, such other location as is agreed
on by the parties, or a location designated by the court.
(4) Visual Recording and Photographs. For deponents
18 years of age or older, a discovery deposition must not be visually
recorded unless ordered by the court for good cause shown or on
the consent of the parties and the deponent. For deponents less
than 18 years of age, a discovery deposition must be audio-visually
recorded unless otherwise ordered by the court. No deponent may
be photographed during a discovery deposition.
(5) Depositions of Law Enforcement Officers. Subject to
the general provisions of subdivision (h)(1), law enforcement officers
must appear for deposition, without subpoena, on written notice of
taking deposition delivered at the physical address of the law
enforcement agency or department, or the e-mail or other address
designated by the law enforcement agency or department, 7 days
before the date of the deposition. For the purposes of this
subdivision, if a law enforcement agency agrees to accept written
notice by e-mail, each law enforcement agency must designate e-
mail addresses for agency liaisons that will accept electronic service
of deposition notices on behalf of the agency’s employees. Any
physical address or e-mail address designated by a law enforcement
agency or department for service of notice of deposition must be
provided by the prosecuting attorney with discovery. Law
enforcement officers who fail to appear for deposition after being
served notice as required by the rule may be adjudged in contempt
of court.
(6) Witness Coordinating Office/Notice of Taking
Deposition. If a witness coordinating office has been established in
the jurisdiction under applicable Florida Statutes, the deposition of
any witness should be coordinated through that office. The witness
coordinating office should attempt to schedule the depositions of a
witness at a time and location convenient for the witness and
acceptable to the parties.
(7) Defendant’s Physical Presence. A defendant may not
be physically present at a deposition except on stipulation of the
parties or as provided by this rule. The court may order the physical
presence of the defendant on a showing of good cause. The court
may consider:
(A) the need for the physical presence of the
defendant to obtain effective discovery;
(B) the intimidating effect of the defendant’s
presence on the witness, if any;
(C) any cost or inconvenience which may result;
and
(D) any alternative communication technology
available.
(8) Telephonic Statements. On stipulation of the parties
and the consent of the witness, the statement of any witness may
be taken by telephone in lieu of the deposition of the witness. In
such case, the witness need not be under oath. The statement,
however, must be recorded and may be used for impeachment at
trial as a prior inconsistent statement under the Florida Evidence
Code.
(9) On motion of any party, parent, guardian, attorney,
guardian ad litem, or other advocate for a victim or witness under
the age of 18, a person who has an intellectual disability, or a
sexual offense victim or witness, or on the court’s own motion, the
court can limit interviewing or the conducting of depositions in the
presence of the defendant. The court must consider any fact the
court deems relevant, not limited to age, nature of the offense,
relationship to the defendant, and degree of emotional trauma that
could result as a consequence of the defendant’s presence.
(10) Deposition of a victim of a sexual offense who is
under the age of 16. A party seeking to take a deposition under this
subdivision must file a written motion with the court. Within 30
days of the filing of the written motion unless agreed upon by the
parties or for good cause shown, the court must conduct a hearing
to determine whether to order the deposition to be conducted. In
determining whether to order the deposition to be conducted, the
court must consider:
(A) the mental and physical age and maturity of
the victim;
(B) the nature and duration of the offense;
(C) the relationship of the victim to the defendant;
(D) the complexity of the issues involved;
(E) whether the evidence sought is reasonably
available by other means, including whether the victim was the
subject of a forensic interview related to the sexual offense; and
(F) any other factors the court deems relevant to
ensure the protection of the victim and the integrity of the judicial
process.
(11) Deposition of a victim of a sexual offense who is
under the age of 12. There is a presumption that the taking of a
deposition of a victim of a sexual offense who is under the age of 12
is inappropriate if the state has not filed a notice of intent to seek
the death penalty and a forensic interview of the sexual offense
victim is available to the defendant. In making that determination,
the court may consider the factors set forth in subdivision (h)(9) of
this rule. A party seeking to take a deposition under this
subdivision must file a written motion with the court. Within 30
days of the filing of the written motion unless agreed upon by the
parties or for good cause shown, the court must conduct a hearing
to determine whether to order the deposition to be conducted.
(12) Limitations or conditions on manner and scope of
deposition. If the court orders the deposition to be conducted
pursuant to subdivision (h)(10) or (11), the court may order
limitations or specific conditions such as:
(A) requiring the defendant to submit proposed
deposition questions to the court for approval prior to commencing
the deposition;
(B) setting the time and place of the deposition;
(C) permitting or prohibiting any person from
attending the victim’s deposition;
(D) limiting the duration of the deposition; or
(E) any other conditions the court finds just and
appropriate.
(13) Court order. The court must enter a written order
finding whether the taking of a deposition under subdivision (h)(10)
or (11) is authorized, and the written order must specify any
limitations to the manner or scope of the taking of the victim’s
deposition.
(i) Investigations Not to Be Impeded. Except as is
otherwise provided as to matters not subject to disclosure or
restricted by protective orders, neither the counsel for the parties
nor other prosecution or defense personnel may advise persons
having relevant material or information, except the defendant, to
refrain from discussing the case with opposing counsel or showing
opposing counsel any relevant material, nor may they otherwise
impede opposing counsel’s investigation of the case.
(j) Continuing Duty to Disclose. If, subsequent to
compliance with the rules, a party discovers additional witnesses or
material that the party would have been under a duty to disclose or
produce at the time of the previous compliance, the party must
promptly disclose or produce the witnesses or material in the same
manner as required under these rules for initial discovery. This
duty includes any additional recorded or unrecorded statements of
any person disclosed under subdivisions (b)(1)(A) or (d)(1)(A) of this
rule that materially alter a written or recorded statement previously
provided under these rules.
(k) Court May Alter Times. The court may alter the times
for compliance with any discovery under these rules on good cause
shown.
(l) Protective Orders.
(1) Motion to Restrict Disclosure of Matters. On a
showing of good cause, the court must at any time order that
specified disclosures be restricted, deferred, or exempted from
discovery, that certain matters not be inquired into, that the scope
of the deposition be limited to certain matters, that a deposition be
sealed and after being sealed be opened only by order of the court,
or make such other order as is appropriate to protect a witness
from harassment, unnecessary inconvenience, or invasion of
privacy, including prohibiting the taking of a deposition. All
material and information to which a party is entitled, however,
must be disclosed in time to permit the party to make beneficial use
of it.
(2) Motion to Terminate or Limit Examination. At any
time during the taking of a deposition, on motion of a party or of the
deponent, and on a showing that the examination is being
conducted in bad faith or in such manner as to unreasonably
annoy, embarrass, or oppress the deponent or party, the court in
which the action is pending or the circuit court where the
deposition is being taken may:
(A) terminate the deposition;
(B) limit the scope and manner of the taking of the
deposition;
(C) limit the time of the deposition;
(D) continue the deposition to a later time;
(E) order the deposition to be taken in open court;
and
(F) impose any sanction authorized by this rule.
If the order terminates the deposition, it may be resumed
thereafter only on the order of the court in which the action is
pending. On demand of any party or deponent, the taking of the
deposition must be suspended for the time necessary to make a
motion for an order.
(m) In Camera and Ex Parte Proceedings.
(1) Any person may move for an order denying or
regulating disclosure of sensitive matters. The court may consider
the matters contained in the motion in camera.
(2) On request, the court must allow the defendant to
make an ex parte showing of good cause for taking the deposition of
a Category B witness.
(3) A record must be made of proceedings authorized
under this subdivision. If the court enters an order granting relief
after an in camera inspection or ex parte showing, the entire record
of the proceeding must be sealed and preserved and be made
available to the appellate court in the event of an appeal.
(n) Sanctions.
(1) If, at any time during the course of the proceedings,
it is brought to the attention of the court that a party has failed to
comply with an applicable discovery rule or with an order issued
under an applicable discovery rule, the court may order the party to
comply with the discovery or inspection of materials not previously
disclosed or produced, grant a continuance, grant a mistrial,
prohibit the party from calling a witness not disclosed or
introducing in evidence the material not disclosed, or enter such
other order as it deems just under the circumstances.
(2) Willful violation by counsel or a party not
represented by counsel of an applicable discovery rule, or an order
issued under an applicable discovery rules, subjects counsel or the
unrepresented party to appropriate sanctions by the court. The
sanctions may include, but are not limited to, contempt proceedings
against the attorney or unrepresented party, as well as the
assessment of costs incurred by the opposing party, when
appropriate.
(3) Every request for discovery or response or objection,
including a notice of deposition made by a party represented by an
attorney, must be signed by at least 1 attorney of record, as defined
by Florida Rule of General Practice and Judicial Administration
2.505, in the attorney’s individual name, whose address must be
stated. A party who is not represented by an attorney must sign the
request, response, or objection and list his or her address. The
signature of the attorney constitutes a certification that the
document complies with Florida Rule of General Practice and
Judicial Administration 2.515. The signature of the attorney or
party constitutes a certification that the signer has read the
request, response, or objection and that to the best of the signer’s
knowledge, information, or belief formed after a reasonable inquiry
it is:
(A) consistent with these rules and warranted by
existing law or a good faith argument for the extension,
modification, or reversal of existing law;
(B) not interposed for any improper purpose, such
as to harass or to cause unnecessary delay or needless increase in
the cost of litigation; and
(C) not unreasonable or unduly burdensome or
expensive, given the needs of the case and the importance of the
issues at stake in the litigation.
If a request, response, or objection is not signed, it must be
stricken unless it is signed promptly after the omission is called to
the attention of the party making the request, response, or
objection, and a party may not be obligated to take any action with
respect to it until it is signed.
If a certification is made in violation of this rule, the court, on
motion or on its own initiative, must impose on the person who
made the certification, the firm or agency with which the person is
affiliated, the party on whose behalf the request, response, or
objection is made, or any or all of the above an appropriate
sanction, which may include an order to pay the amount of the
reasonable expenses incurred because of the violation, including a
reasonable attorney’s fee.
(o) Pretrial Conference.
(1) The trial court may hold 1 or more pretrial
conferences to consider such matters as will promote a fair and
expeditious trial. The defendant must be present at any pretrial
conference, unless the defendant’s presence is waived in writing or
on the record by the defendant or by the defendant’s counsel with
the defendant’s consent.
(2) The court may set, and on the request of any party
must set, a discovery schedule, including a discovery cut-off date,
at the pretrial conference.
RULE 3.850. MOTION TO VACATE; SET ASIDE; OR CORRECT
SENTENCE
(a) Grounds for Motion. The following grounds may be
claims for relief from judgment or release from custody by a person
who has been tried and found guilty or has entered a plea of guilty
or nolo contendere before a court established by the laws of Florida:
(1) the judgment was entered or sentence was imposed
in violation of the Constitution or laws of the United States or the
State of Florida;
(2) the court did not have jurisdiction to enter the
judgment;
(3) the court did not have jurisdiction to impose the
sentence;
(4) the sentence exceeded the maximum authorized by
law;
(5) the plea was involuntary; or
(6) the judgment or sentence is otherwise subject to
collateral attack.
(b) Time Limitations. A motion to vacate a sentence that
exceeds the limits provided by law may be filed at any time. No
other motion may be filed or considered under this rule if filed more
than 2 years after the judgment and sentence become final unless it
alleges that:
(1) the facts on which the claim is predicated were
unknown to the movant or the movant’s attorney and could not
have been ascertained by the exercise of due diligence, and the
claim is made within 2 years of the time the new facts were or could
have been discovered with the exercise of due diligence;
(2) the fundamental constitutional right asserted was
not established within the period provided for herein and has been
held to apply retroactively, and the claim is made within 2 years of
the date of the mandate of the decision announcing the
retroactivity; or
(3) the defendant retained counsel to timely file a 3.850
motion and counsel, through neglect, failed to file the motion. A
claim based on this exception may not be filed more than 2 years
after the expiration of the time for filing a motion for postconviction
relief.
(c) Contents of Motion. The motion must be under oath
stating that the defendant has read the motion or that it has been
read to him or her, that the defendant understands its content, and
that all of the facts stated therein are true and correct. The motion
must include the certifications required by subdivision (p) of this
rule and must also include an explanation of:
(1) the judgment or sentence under attack and the
court that rendered the same;
(2) whether the judgment resulted from a plea or a
trial;
(3) whether there was an appeal from the judgment or
sentence and the disposition thereof;
(4) whether a previous postconviction motion has been
filed, and if so, how many;
(5) if a previous motion or motions have been filed, the
reason or reasons the claim or claims in the present motion were
not raised in the former motion or motions;
(6) the nature of the relief sought; and
(7) a brief statement of the facts and other conditions
relied on in support of the motion.
This rule does not authorize relief based on grounds that could
have or should have been raised at trial and, if properly preserved,
on direct appeal of the judgment and sentence.
(d) Claims of Newly Discovered Evidence. If the defendant
is filing a newly discovered evidence claim based on recanted trial
testimony or on a newly discovered witness, the defendant must
include an affidavit from that person as an attachment to his or her
motion. For all other newly discovered evidence claims, the
defendant must attach an affidavit from any person whose
testimony is necessary to factually support the defendant’s claim for
relief. If the affidavit is not attached to the motion, the defendant
must provide an explanation why the required affidavit could not be
obtained.
(e) Claims of Failure to Call Witnesses.
(1) If the defendant is filing a claim of ineffective
assistance of counsel for failing to call a witness or witnesses, other
than an expert witness, the defendant must specifically allege the
identity of the witness(es), the substance of their testimony,
whether the witness(es) was available to testify at trial, and how the
defendant was prejudiced. Additionally, the defendant must identify
any known documentation, which may include, but is not limited to
police reports, sworn statements, or depositions supporting the
claim, or indicate why such documentation cannot be identified.
(2) If the defendant is filing a claim of ineffective
assistance of counsel for failing to call or investigate an expert
witness or expert witnesses, the defendant must allege how the
defendant was prejudiced for the failure to call or investigate the
expert witness(es). Should an evidentiary hearing be granted based
on a claim for failure to call or investigate an expert witness or
expert witnesses, the defendant must name the expert witness(es)
and provide any report from the expert witness(es) to the court and
the state attorney within 30 days before an evidentiary hearing.
Failure to name the expert witness(es) within the 30-day period of
time provided by this rule may, absent a showing of good cause,
result in the dismissal of such a claim with prejudice.
(f) Form of Motion. Motions must be typewritten or hand-
written in legible printed lettering, in blue or black ink, double-
spaced, with margins no less than 1 inch on white 8 1/2 by 11 inch
paper. No motion, including any memorandum of law, may exceed
50 pages without leave of the court upon a showing of good cause.
(g) Amendments to Motion. When the court has entered an
order under subdivision (h)(2) or (h)(3), granting the defendant an
opportunity to amend the motion, any amendment to the motion
must be served within 60 days. A motion may otherwise be
amended at any time prior to either the entry of an order disposing
of the motion or the entry of an order pursuant to subdivision (h)(5)
or directing that an answer to the motion be filed pursuant to (h)(6),
whichever occurs first. Leave of court is required for the filing of an
amendment after the entry of an order pursuant to subdivision
(h)(5) or (h)(6). Notwithstanding the timeliness of an amendment,
the court need not consider new factual assertions contained in an
amendment unless the amendment is under oath. New claims for
relief contained in an amendment need not be considered by the
court unless the amendment is filed within the time frame specified
in subdivision (b).
(h) Procedure; Evidentiary Hearing; Disposition. On filing
of a motion under this rule, the clerk shall forward the motion and
file to the court. Disposition of the motion shall be in accordance
with the following procedures, which are intended to result in a
single, final, appealable order that disposes of all claims raised in
the motion.
(1) Untimely and Insufficient Motions. If the motion is
insufficient on its face, and the time to file a motion under this rule
has expired prior to the filing of the motion, the court must enter a
final appealable order summarily denying the motion with
prejudice.
(2) Timely but Insufficient Motions. If the motion is
insufficient on its face, and the motion is timely filed under this
rule, the court shall enter a nonfinal, nonappealable order allowing
the defendant 60 days to amend the motion. If the amended motion
is still insufficient or if the defendant fails to file an amended
motion within the time allowed for such amendment, the court may
permit the defendant an additional opportunity to amend the
motion or may enter a final, appealable order summarily denying
the motion with prejudice.
(3) Timely Motions Containing Some Insufficient Claims.
If the motion sufficiently states 1 or more claims for relief and it
also attempts but fails to state additional claims, and the motion is
timely filed under this rule, the court must enter a nonappealable
order granting the defendant 60 days to amend the motion to
sufficiently state additional claims for relief. Any claim for which the
insufficiency has not been cured within the time allowed for such
amendment must be summarily denied in an order that is a
nonfinal, nonappealable order, which may be reviewed when a final,
appealable order is entered.
(4) Motions Partially Disposed of by the Court Record. If
the motion sufficiently states 1 or more claims for relief but the files
and records in the case conclusively show that the defendant is not
entitled to relief as to 1 or more claims, the claims that are
conclusively refuted must be summarily denied on the merits
without a hearing. A copy of that portion of the files and records in
the case that conclusively shows that the defendant is not entitled
to relief as to 1 or more claims must be attached to the order
summarily denying these claims. The files and records in the case
are the documents and exhibits previously filed in the case and
those portions of the other proceedings in the case that can be
transcribed. An order that does not resolve all the claims is a
nonfinal, nonappealable order, which may be reviewed when a final,
appealable order is entered.
(5) Motions Conclusively Resolved by the Court Record.
If the motion is legally sufficient but all grounds in the motion can
be conclusively resolved either as a matter of law or by reliance
upon the records in the case, the motion must be denied without a
hearing by the entry of a final order. If the denial is based on the
records in the case, a copy of that portion of the files and records
that conclusively shows that the defendant is entitled to no relief
must be attached to the final order.
(6) Motions Requiring a Response from the State
Attorney. Unless the motion, files, and records in the case
conclusively show that the defendant is entitled to no relief, the
court must order the state attorney to file, within the time fixed by
the court, an answer to the motion. The answer must respond to
the allegations contained in the defendant’s sufficiently pleaded
claims, describe any matters in avoidance of the sufficiently pleaded
claims, state whether the defendant has used any other available
state postconviction remedies including any other motion under
this rule, and state whether the defendant has previously been
afforded an evidentiary hearing.
(7) Appointment of Counsel. The court may appoint
counsel to represent the defendant under this rule. The factors to
be considered by the court in making this determination include:
the adversary nature of the proceeding, the complexity of the
proceeding, the complexity of the claims presented, the defendant’s
apparent level of intelligence and education, the need for an
evidentiary hearing, and the need for substantial legal research.
(8) Disposition by Evidentiary Hearing.
(A) If an evidentiary hearing is required, the court
must grant a prompt hearing, cause notice to be served on the state
attorney and the defendant or defendant’s counsel, determine the
issues, and make findings of fact and conclusions of law with
respect thereto.
(B) At an evidentiary hearing, the defendant has
the burden of presenting evidence and the burden of proof in
support of his or her motion, unless otherwise provided by law.
(C) The order issued after the evidentiary hearing
must resolve all the claims raised in the motion and is considered
the final order for purposes of appeal.
(i) Defendant’s Presence Not Required. The defendant’s
presence shall not be required at any hearing or conference held
under this rule except at the evidentiary hearing on the merits of
any claim.
(j) Successive Motions.
(1) A second or successive motion must be titled:
“Second or Successive Motion for Postconviction Relief.”
(2) A second or successive motion is an extraordinary
pleading. Accordingly, a court may dismiss a second or successive
motion if the court finds that it fails to allege new or different
grounds for relief and the prior determination was on the merits or,
if new and different grounds are alleged, the judge finds that the
failure of the defendant or the attorney to assert those grounds in a
prior motion constituted an abuse of the procedure or there was no
good cause for the failure of the defendant or defendant’s counsel to
have asserted those grounds in a prior motion. When a motion is
dismissed under this subdivision, a copy of that portion of the files
and records necessary to support the court’s ruling must
accompany the order denying the motion.
(k) Service on Parties. The clerk of the court must promptly
serve on the parties a copy of any order entered under this rule,
noting thereon the date of service by an appropriate certificate of
service.
(l) Rehearing. Any party may file a motion for rehearing of
any order addressing a motion under this rule within 15 days of the
date of service of the order. A motion for rehearing is not required to
preserve any issue for review in the appellate court. A motion for
rehearing must be based on a good faith belief that the court has
overlooked a previously argued issue of fact or law or an argument
based on a legal precedent or statute not available prior to the
court’s ruling. A response may be filed within 10 days of service of
the motion. The trial court’s order disposing of the motion for
rehearing must be filed within 15 days of the response but not later
than 40 days from the date of the order of which rehearing is
sought.
(m) Appeals. An appeal may be taken to the appropriate
appellate court only from the final order disposing of the motion. All
final orders denying motions for postconviction relief must include a
statement that the defendant has the right to appeal within 30 days
of the rendition of the order. All nonfinal, nonappealable orders
entered pursuant to subdivision (h) should include a statement that
the defendant has no right to appeal the order until entry of the
final order.
(n) Belated Appeals and Discretionary Review. Pursuant
to the procedures outlined in Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure
9.141, a defendant may seek a belated appeal or discretionary
review.
(o) Habeas Corpus. An application for writ of habeas corpus
on behalf of a prisoner who is authorized to apply for relief by
motion pursuant to this rule must not be entertained if it appears
that the applicant has failed to apply for relief, by motion, to the
court that sentenced the applicant or that the court has denied the
applicant relief, unless it also appears that the remedy by motion is
inadequate or ineffective to test the legality of the applicant’s
detention.
(p) Certification of Defendant; Sanctions. No motion may
be filed pursuant to this rule unless it is filed in good faith and with
a reasonable belief that it is timely, has potential merit, and does
not duplicate previous motions that have been disposed of by the
court.
(1) By signing a motion pursuant to this rule, the
defendant certifies that: the defendant has read the motion or that
it has been read to the defendant and that the defendant
understands its content; the motion is filed in good faith and with a
reasonable belief that it is timely filed, has potential merit, and does
not duplicate previous motions that have been disposed of by the
court; and, the facts contained in the motion are true and correct.
(2) The defendant must either certify that the
defendant can understand English or, if the defendant cannot
understand English, that the defendant has had the motion
translated completely into a language that the defendant
understands. The motion must contain the name and address of
the person who translated the motion and that person must certify
that he or she provided an accurate and complete translation to the
defendant. Failure to include this information and certification in a
motion is grounds for the entry of an order dismissing the motion
pursuant to subdivision (h)(1), (h)(2), or (h)(3).
(3) Conduct prohibited under this rule includes, but is
not limited to, the following:
(A) the filing of frivolous or malicious claims;
(B) the filing of any motion in bad faith or with
reckless disregard for the truth;
(C) the filing of an application for habeas corpus
subject to dismissal pursuant to subdivision (o);
(D) the willful violation of any provision of this
rule; and
(E) the abuse of the legal process or procedures
governed by this rule.
The court, upon its own motion or on the motion of a party,
may determine whether a motion has been filed in violation of this
rule. The court must issue an order setting forth the facts
indicating that the defendant has or may have engaged in
prohibited conduct. The order must direct the defendant to show
cause, within a reasonable time limit set by the court, why the
court should not find that the defendant has engaged in prohibited
conduct under this rule and impose an appropriate sanction.
Following the issuance of the order to show cause and the filing of
any response by the defendant, and after such further hearing as
the court may deem appropriate, the court must make a final
determination of whether the defendant engaged in prohibited
conduct under this subdivision.
(4) If the court finds by the greater weight of the
evidence that the defendant has engaged in prohibited conduct
under this rule, the court may impose one or more sanctions,
including:
(A) contempt as otherwise provided by law;
(B) assessing the costs of the proceeding against
the defendant;
(C) dismissal with prejudice of the defendant’s
motion;
(D) prohibiting the filing of further pro se motions
under this rule and directing the clerk of court to summarily reject
any further pro se motion under this rule;
(E) requiring that any further motions under this
rule be signed by a member in good standing of The Florida Bar,
who must certify that there is a good faith basis for each claim
asserted in the motion; and/or
(F) if the defendant is a prisoner, a certified copy
of the order be forwarded to the appropriate institution or facility for
consideration of disciplinary action against the defendant, including
forfeiture of gain time pursuant to Chapter 944, Florida Statutes.
(5) If the court determines there is probable cause to
believe that a sworn motion contains a false statement of fact
constituting perjury, the court may refer the matter to the state
attorney.
Source: The Florida Bar, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure — the official publication. Current as of the January 1, 2026 edition.
Working a Florida case?
The arresting officer's record is part of the procedure.
Speedy trial, discovery, and suppression all turn on what the officers did — and on who they are. BenchRecon's Officer Lookup searches a Florida officer's FDLE/CJSTC certification-discipline and incident-ledger record — every row cited to the underlying public record — surfacing the impeachment and suppression angles a procedural read alone won't show.
Florida results currently show FDLE/CJSTC certification discipline and incident-ledger rows only, not local-agency internal affairs complaints or Brady/Giglio lists.
Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure — common questions.
What does this Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure reference cover?
It reproduces the full verbatim text of the procedural rules a Florida criminal-defense practice turns to most — speedy trial (3.191), discovery (3.220), pretrial motions and motion to dismiss (3.190), pretrial release and detention (3.131 and 3.132), pleas (3.170), indictments and informations (3.140), adversary preliminary hearings (3.133), right to counsel (3.111), and postconviction relief (3.850) — plus an index of the remaining rules, each linked to the official Florida Bar publication.
Is the rule text official and verbatim?
Yes. The full-text rules are reproduced exactly from the official Florida Bar publication of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. Nothing is paraphrased or summarized. Each rule links to the official source for the full, current, controlling text.
What is the Florida speedy trial rule?
Rule 3.191. Without a demand, a person must be brought to trial within 90 days for a misdemeanor or 175 days for a felony; on a written demand, within the time the rule provides. The full verbatim text, including the recapture period and remedies, is reproduced on this page.
Is this legal advice?
No. It is a navigation aid for locating and reading the rules; the official publication controls and nothing here is legal advice.