- 01.
Zafiro held that mutually antagonistic defenses are not per se prejudicial — this template frames the 'compelling prejudice' showing Zafiro requires.
- 02.
Spillover theory: a minor participant's discrete conduct is buried under massive evidence of a conspiracy they weren't central to.
- 03.
Cross-exam preparation targets the government's argument that a limiting instruction cures the prejudice.
Order intake.
Frequently asked questions.
What does the motion contain?
Eight sections: cover (your case identifier + jurisdiction stamped on), prejudice-theory analysis, the lead authority's verbatim holding with source URL, attaching-precedent citations (Richardson / Gray / Zafiro / Opper), the pre-drafted motion language (~250 words editable), reply-brief framework anticipating the government's preference for joint trials, circuit-specific prejudice-standard overlay, and the methods + source URLs bibliography.
Is this legal advice?
No. The template is a pre-trial litigation aid modeled on the published constitutional authority for federal severance motions. Counsel of record adapts the motion language to the controlling circuit's doctrine and the facts of the case before filing.
How fast is delivery?
Stripe checkout completes in seconds; the PDF is emailed to the address you provide. Templates are pre-built — there is no per-case data pipeline running.
Do you cite anything I cannot independently verify?
No. Every citation carries a source URL stored alongside. Lead authorities are Bruton v. United States 391 U.S. 123 (1968), Richardson v. Marsh 481 U.S. 200 (1987), Gray v. Maryland 523 U.S. 185 (1998), and Zafiro v. United States 506 U.S. 534 (1993). All public-domain, verified during Phase B template authorship per the no-hallucinated-legal-data rule.
Refund policy?
7-day full refund, no questions asked.