Brief generation launches May 2026. Join the waitlist for a free pilot brief at launch. Join waitlist →
SKIP TO MAIN CONTENT
BENCHRECON

← Speedy Trial Act Audit

Federal CDs handling pretrial detention and motion-to-dismiss timing.

Speedy Trial Act Audit — 18 U.S.C. § 3161 clock + excludable-time review

Pre-drafted Speedy Trial Act audit with § 3161 clock math, excludable-time framework, and § 3162(a)(2) dismissal motion. Bloate + Tinklenberg + Barker grounded.

Run the indictment-to-trial clock against the docket, identify the excludable-time categories the government will invoke, and file the § 3162(a)(2) motion to dismiss with the clock math, attaching-precedent record, and reply-brief framework already drafted.

Allowing prospective waivers would seriously undermine the Act because there are many cases — like the case at hand — in which the prosecution, the defense, and the court would all be happy to opt out of the Act, to the detriment of the public interest.

Justice Alito, Zedner v. United States, 547 U.S. 489 (2006)(opens in new tab)
Order — $97 →

PDF delivered to your inbox.


What this audit gives you that a hand-coded docket review does not.
  1. 01.

    Most Speedy Trial Act motions miss Bloate's preparation-time holding — the government routinely codes preparation-time exclusions that Bloate forecloses.

  2. 02.

    Tinklenberg held that pretrial-motion clock stops do not require the motion to actually delay trial — clean cite that AUSAs concede on the docket review.

  3. 03.

    Reply-brief framework anticipates the government's § 3161(h)(7) ends-of-justice continuance defense and the with-or-without-prejudice § 3162(a)(2) factor analysis.

Order intake.

Speedy Trial Act Audit — Case details

Audit PDF delivered here. Stripe checkout uses this address.

Do not enter the actual client name. Use any internal identifier — BenchRecon never needs the real name.

Stamps the audit cover and informs which circuit's excludable-time overlay applies.

Billing entity — rendered on the audit cover and included on the invoice when provided.

Privilege handling

Intake data is stored under attorney work-product principles. BenchRecon does not access the intake payload outside of audit generation. Do not enter privileged client communications, defense strategy, or identifying details — submit only the case parameters this form requests.

Charged after you submit. 7-day full refund.

Frequently asked questions.

What does the audit contain?

Nine sections: cover (your case identifier + jurisdiction stamped on), the indictment-to-trial clock math, the lead authority section anchored on 18 U.S.C. § 3161 + Bloate, the excludable-time framework walking each § 3161(h) category, attaching-precedent citations (Tinklenberg, Zedner, Barker), pre-drafted § 3162(a)(2) motion language, a reply-brief framework anticipating the government's ends-of-justice continuance defense, the with-or-without-prejudice dismissal-standard analysis, and the methods + source URLs bibliography.

Is this legal advice?

No. The template is a pretrial litigation aid modeled on the published statutory text and Supreme Court authority for the Speedy Trial Act. Counsel of record adapts the clock math and motion language to the controlling circuit's doctrine and the actual docket of the case before filing.

How fast is delivery?

Stripe checkout completes in seconds; the PDF is emailed to the address you provide. Templates are pre-built — there is no per-case data pipeline running.

Do you cite anything I cannot independently verify?

No. Every citation carries a source URL stored alongside. Lead authorities are 18 U.S.C. § 3161, 18 U.S.C. § 3162, United States v. Bloate 559 U.S. 196 (2010), United States v. Tinklenberg 563 U.S. 647 (2011), Zedner v. United States 547 U.S. 489 (2006), and Barker v. Wingo 407 U.S. 514 (1972). All public-domain, verified during Phase B template authorship per the no-hallucinated-legal-data rule.

Refund policy?

7-day full refund, no questions asked.

Speedy Trial Act Audit | BenchRecon — BenchRecon