Terry Stop Motion
Fourth Amendment suppression motion for Terry stops lacking articulable reasonable suspicion. Terry v. Ohio + Illinois v. Wardlow doctrine.
Fourth Amendment suppression motion for Terry stops lacking articulable reasonable suspicion. Terry v. Ohio + Illinois v. Wardlow doctrine.
Fourth Amendment + equal-protection motion to suppress evidence from a traffic stop used as a pretext for a narcotics investigation. Whren v. United States + race-selective enforcement doctrine.
Fourth Amendment suppression motion attacking consent voluntariness. Schneckloth v. Bustamonte + Bumper v. North Carolina coercion doctrine.
Fourth Amendment Franks challenge to a search warrant supported by false or recklessly omitted material statements. Franks v. Delaware doctrine.
Fourth Amendment suppression motion for search warrants where the probable-cause predicate had grown too stale to support a reasonable belief that evidence remained at the location.
Fourth Amendment suppression motion for CSLI obtained without a warrant or by subpoena. Carpenter v. United States doctrine.
Fourth Amendment suppression motion rebutting the government's Leon good-faith exception defense. Leon + Groh v. Ramirez + Herring v. United States doctrine.
Fourth Amendment suppression motion for evidence derived from an unlawful search or seizure. Wong Sun v. United States doctrine.
The math: $97/mo gets you 3 briefs/mo (any combo of Sentencing Snapshot, JSIN Exclusion Brief, or Forensic Foundation Pack templates). At ~$177/hr CJA rate, that’s one billable hour to recover an entire month of brief work.
CJA panel rate cited: $177/hr (2026 non-capital schedule, effective 2026-01-01). Source: uscourts.gov.
Working on the model now. Drop your email if you want first access.
Per motion type: a pre-drafted suppression motion (~250 words editable), a reply-brief framework anticipating the government's expected response, an 8-12 question cross-examination bank for the testifying officer, and controlling authority citations (lead case + 2-4 supporting authorities) with source URLs stored.
No. The templates are research artifacts modeled on Fourth Amendment suppression doctrine. Counsel of record adapts the motion language to circuit-specific precedent and the facts of the case before filing.
A targeted Fourth Amendment research and motion-drafting pull commonly takes 4-8 hours of attorney time at a typical CJA panel rate (~$177/hr). The brief is priced at roughly 7-12% of that recovered billable time.
Buying all 8 motions individually would be $776. The bundle is priced at $497 — for practices with a Fourth Amendment caseload, the marginal cost of motion types you do not file this month is small relative to the up-front time savings on the ones you do.
Every citation in every template carries a source URL. Lead authorities are drawn from United States Supreme Court opinions and binding circuit precedent, verified against CourtListener and official U.S. government sources. The no-fabrication rule: a citation without a working source URL does not ship.
The Fourth Amendment doctrine does. Terry, Katz, Carpenter, and the good-faith and fruit-of-the-poisonous-tree lines are United States Supreme Court holdings that bind every state court, and these suppression theories are litigated in state DUI, drug, and stop-and-frisk hearings constantly. The motion documents themselves are drafted for federal practice — several open by moving under Fed. R. Crim. P. 12, and the evidentiary-hearing request references a federal district local rule — so counsel restates the motion under the state's suppression-motion rule and adapts the hearing request and local-rule citation to the state court's procedure before filing. The constitutional argument is the same in every court; the procedural frame is federal and you adapt it to your forum.
7-day full refund on every motion template, single or bundle. No questions asked.
CJA panel rate cited: $177/hr (2026 non-capital schedule, effective 2026-01-01). Source: uscourts.gov.